Primary Closure of Pilonidal Sinus With Slide-Swing Skin Flap Compared With the Secondary Closure: A Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
- PMID: 36699764
- PMCID: PMC9867900
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.32880
Primary Closure of Pilonidal Sinus With Slide-Swing Skin Flap Compared With the Secondary Closure: A Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Introduction: There are many surgical approaches for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) therapy, ranging from wide excision repair to less morbid excisions with primary/flap closure. The off-midline flaps, which shift the incision line away from the midline natal cleft, have been associated with lower recurrence rates than the conventional mid-line closure techniques. This single-blinded randomized controlled trial aims to compare the short/long-term efficacy and outcome of the slide-swing flap technique with the conventional secondary wound closure.
Method and materials: This study was a prospective randomized controlled trial conducted on patients with PSD. Patients were assigned into two groups: secondary closure (control) and slide-swing flap (trial). Patients were advised to visit the surgical clinic two times weekly for the two weeks after the operation for at least six months.
Results: In this study, 100 patients were enrolled. They were assigned into two groups of control, and trial. The mean age of all participants was 29.15 ± 8.36 years old (age range: 18-62 years old). The mean operation time was 39.65 ± 12.63 for both groups, with the control group being 29.70 ± 7.71 and the swing flap group 46.90 ± 7.81. Patient visual analog scale (VAS) scores in both groups revealed that the trial group was associated with lower VAS scores compared with patients who underwent secondary closure (p-value = 0.006). Also, the trial group demonstrated a higher rate of healing, better cosmetic outcomes, and quicker recovery time compared with the controls.
Conclusion: Compared with secondary closure, the slide-swing flap was associated with excellent cosmetic outcomes, disease recurrence, and recovery time. Also, the post-operative complications were significantly lower compared with the traditional method.
Keywords: flap technique; limberg flap; pilonidal sinus disease; secondary closure; slide-swing skin flap.
Copyright © 2022, Mahmoudvand et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Excision with primary midline closure compared with Limberg flap in the treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease: a randomised clinical trial.Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2019 Jan;101(1):21-29. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2018.0144. Epub 2018 Oct 5. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2019. PMID: 30286636 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Elliptical excision with midline primary closure versus rhomboid excision with limberg flap reconstruction in sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease: a prospective, randomized study.Indian J Surg. 2012 Aug;74(4):305-8. doi: 10.1007/s12262-011-0400-9. Epub 2012 Jan 7. Indian J Surg. 2012. PMID: 23904719 Free PMC article.
-
Primary wound closure with a Limberg flap vs. secondary wound healing after excision of a pilonidal sinus: a multicentre randomised controlled study.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Jan;30(1):97-103. doi: 10.1007/s00384-014-2057-x. Epub 2014 Nov 5. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015. PMID: 25367184 Clinical Trial.
-
Karydakis flap reconstruction versus Limberg flap transposition for pilonidal sinus disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018 Aug;403(5):547-554. doi: 10.1007/s00423-018-1697-7. Epub 2018 Jul 31. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018. PMID: 30066108
-
A comparison of flap reconstruction vs the laying open technique or excision and direct suture for pilonidal sinus disease: A meta-analysis of randomised studies.Int Wound J. 2019 Oct;16(5):1119-1135. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13163. Epub 2019 Jun 23. Int Wound J. 2019. PMID: 31230414 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Pilonidal sinus disease. de Parades V, Bouchard D, Janier M, Berger A. J Visc Surg. 2013;150:237–247. - PubMed
-
- Evaluation of the risk factors of pilonidal sinus: a single center experience. Bolandparvaz S, Moghadam Dizaj P, Salahi R, Paydar S, Bananzadeh M, Abbasi HR, Eshraghian A. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2012;23:535–537. - PubMed
-
- Simple and effective surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus: asymmetric excision and primary closure using suction drain and subcuticular skin closure. Akinci OF, Coskun A, Uzunköy A. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:701–707. - PubMed
-
- Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing different techniques with primary closure for chronic pilonidal sinus. Enriquez-Navascues JM, Emparanza JI, Alkorta M, Placer C. Tech Coloproctol. 2014;18:863–872. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources