Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 12;9(2):e1431.
doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001431. eCollection 2023 Feb.

Donor BMI and Post-living Donor Liver Transplantation Outcomes: A Preliminary Report

Affiliations

Donor BMI and Post-living Donor Liver Transplantation Outcomes: A Preliminary Report

Jessica S Lin et al. Transplant Direct. .

Abstract

Living liver donor obesity has been considered a relative contraindication to living donation given the association with hepatic steatosis and potential for poor donor and recipient outcomes. We investigated the association between donor body mass index (BMI) and donor and recipient posttransplant outcomes.

Methods: We studied 66 living donors and their recipients who underwent living donor liver transplant at our center between 2013 and 2020. BMI was divided into 3 categories (<25, 25-29.9, and ≥30 kg/m2). Magnetic resonance imaging-derived proton density fat fraction was used to quantify steatosis. Donor outcomes included length of stay (LOS), emergency department visits within 90 d, hospital readmissions within 90 d, and complication severity. Recipient outcomes included LOS and in-hospital mortality. The Student t test was used to compare normally distributed variables, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for nonparametric data.

Results: There was no difference in donor or recipient characteristics based on donor BMI. There was no significant difference in mean magnetic resonance imaging fat percentage among the 3 groups. Additionally, there was no difference in donor LOS (P = 0.058), emergency department visits (P = 0.64), and hospital readmissions (P = 0.66) across BMI category. Donor complications occurred in 30 patients. There was no difference in postdonation complications across BMI category (P = 0.19); however, there was a difference in wound complications, with the highest rate being seen in the highest BMI group (0% versus 16% versus 37%; P = 0.041). Finally, there was no difference in recipient LOS (P = 0.83) and recipient in-hospital mortality (P = 0.29) across BMI category.

Conclusions: Selecting donors with BMI ≥30 kg/m2 can result in successful living donor liver transplantation; however, they are at risk for perioperative wound complications. Donor counseling and perioperative strategies to mitigate wound-related issues should be used when considering obese living donors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no funding or conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kwong AJ, Kim WR, Lake JR, et al. . OPTN/SRTR 2019 annual data report: liver. Am J Transplant. 2021;21(Suppl 2):208–315. - PubMed
    1. Strong RW, Lynch SV, Ong TH, et al. . Successful liver transplantation from a living donor to her son. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:1505–1507. - PubMed
    1. de Villa V, Lo CM. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in Asia; liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in Asia. Oncologist. 2007;12:1321–1331. - PubMed
    1. Peng CJ, Yuan D, Li B, et al. . Body mass index evaluating donor hepatic steatosis in living donor liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2009;41:3556–3559. - PubMed
    1. Rinella ME, Alonso E, Rao S, et al. . Body mass index as a predictor of hepatic steatosis in living liver donors. Liver Transpl. 2001;7:409–414. - PubMed