A proposal for grading the risk of lymph node metastasis after endoscopic resection of T1 colorectal cancer
- PMID: 36701000
- DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04319-7
A proposal for grading the risk of lymph node metastasis after endoscopic resection of T1 colorectal cancer
Abstract
Purpose: At present, for patients with early colorectal cancer as long as having any one risk factor of lymph node metastasis (LNM) after endoscopic resection (ER), additional surgery will be considered, regardless of the degree of LNM risk; however, most patients are free of LNM. This study aimed to further grade these patients according to LNM risk.
Methods: We assessed 271 patients with T1 colorectal cancers treated initially with ER to analyze the correlation between LNM-associated risk factors and LNM rate. Differences in this rate between groups were estimated using the χ2 test or Fisher's exact test.
Results: Poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (Por) (3.4% vs. 40%, p < 0.001) and lymphovascular infiltration (LV) (1.6% vs. 29.0%, p < 0.001) were the only parameters correlated with LNM. When we divided the cases into LV-negative (LV(-)) and LV-positive (LV(+)) groups, we found a significantly higher LNM rate in the LV(+) group (29.0% vs. 1.6%, p < 0.001). Additionally, the rate of LNM in those positive for each parameter did not differ from the control rate in the same group, except in the Por subgroup. When the cases were divided into four groups based on the presence of LV infiltration and Por, the LNM rate in each group was 2/233 cases (0.8%) in the LV(-)Por(-) group, 2/7 cases (28.5%) in the LV(-)Por(+) group, 7/28 cases (25.0%) in the LV(+)Por(-) group, and 2/3 cases (66.6%) in the LV(+)Por(+) group.
Conclusions: Based on LV and histological differentiation, patients were classified into three LNM risk grades: low (LNM, 0.8%), moderate (LNM, 25.0-28.5%), and high (LNM, 66.6%).
Keywords: Endoscopic resection; Lymph node metastasis; Pathologic diagnosis; Risk factor; T1 colorectal cancer.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer with the only high-risk histology of submucosal invasion depth ≥ 1000 μm.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022 Nov;37(11):2387-2395. doi: 10.1007/s00384-022-04269-6. Epub 2022 Oct 25. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022. PMID: 36283994
-
Predictors for lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer.Endoscopy. 2012 Jun;44(6):590-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1291665. Epub 2012 May 25. Endoscopy. 2012. PMID: 22638780
-
Deep Submucosal Invasion Is Not an Independent Risk Factor for Lymph Node Metastasis in T1 Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.Gastroenterology. 2022 Jul;163(1):174-189. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.04.010. Epub 2022 Apr 15. Gastroenterology. 2022. PMID: 35436498
-
Management of T1 Colorectal Cancer.Digestion. 2025;106(2):122-130. doi: 10.1159/000540594. Epub 2024 Aug 2. Digestion. 2025. PMID: 39097960 Review.
-
Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in T2 colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Clin Oncol. 2024 Jul;29(7):921-931. doi: 10.1007/s10147-024-02547-7. Epub 2024 May 6. Int J Clin Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38709424
Cited by
-
A Retrospective Multicenter Study of Risk Factors, Stratification, and Prognosis of Lymph Node Metastasis in T1 and T2 Colorectal Cancer.J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 18;12(24):7744. doi: 10.3390/jcm12247744. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 38137813 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic Accuracy of Highest-Grade or Predominant Histological Differentiation of T1 Colorectal Cancer in Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar 1;15(3):e00673. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000673. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2024. PMID: 38165075 Free PMC article.
-
An artificial intelligence prediction model outperforms conventional guidelines in predicting lymph node metastasis of T1 colorectal cancer.Front Oncol. 2023 Oct 24;13:1229998. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1229998. eCollection 2023. Front Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37941556 Free PMC article.
-
Refining Risk Criteria May Substantially Reduce Unnecessary Additional Surgeries after Local Resection of T1 Colorectal Cancer.Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jun 25;16(13):2321. doi: 10.3390/cancers16132321. Cancers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39001382 Free PMC article.
-
Endoscopic Treatment of T1 Colorectal Cancer.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jul 30;15(15):3875. doi: 10.3390/cancers15153875. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37568691 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- For the Study Group for Budding/Sprouting in Colorectal Cancer of the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR), Kawachi H, Eishi Y et al (2015) A three-tier classification system based on the depth of submucosal invasion and budding/sprouting can improve the treatment strategy for T1 colorectal cancer: a retrospective multicenter study. Mod Pathol 28:872–879. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2015.36
-
- Nakadoi K, Tanaka S, Kanao H et al (2012) Management of T1 colorectal carcinoma with special reference to criteria for curative endoscopic resection: management of T1 colorectal carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 27:1057–1062. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.07041.x - DOI - PubMed
-
- Suh JP, Youk EG, Lee EJ et al (2013) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for nonpedunculated submucosal invasive colorectal cancer: is it feasible? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 25:1051–1059. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0b013e328361dd39 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Tateishi Y, Nakanishi Y, Taniguchi H et al (2010) Pathological prognostic factors predicting lymph node metastasis in submucosal invasive (T1) colorectal carcinoma. Mod Pathol 23:1068–1072. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2010.88 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Oh JR, Park B, Lee S et al (2019) Nomogram development and external validation for predicting the risk of lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer. Cancer Res Treat 51:1275–1284. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2018.569 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical