Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 15;133(6):e158357.
doi: 10.1172/JCI158357.

Th2-skewed T cells correlate with B cell response to α-Gal and tick antigens in α-Gal syndrome

Affiliations

Th2-skewed T cells correlate with B cell response to α-Gal and tick antigens in α-Gal syndrome

Danijela Apostolovic et al. J Clin Invest. .

Abstract

Tick bites have been shown to transmit a novel form of severe food allergy, the galactose-α-1,3-galactose (α-Gal) syndrome (AGS). Cellular responses to α-Gal in patients with AGS have, to date, not been thoroughly scrutinized. Therefore, we investigated T and B cell proliferation, activation, and cytokine profiles in response to tick protein extract (TE) and α-Gal-free TE in patients with AGS and in healthy controls. T and B cells from both patients and controls proliferated in response to TE, but significantly more in patients with AGS. B cell proliferation, but not T cell proliferation, in patients with AGS was reduced by removing α-Gal from the TE. In addition, TE induced a clear Th2 cytokine profile in patients with AGS. Expression of CD23 by B cells correlated only to T cell proliferation. However, both B cell proliferation and CD23 expression were reduced when CD40L and IL-4 were blocked. A large portion of the IgG1 and IgE antibodies binding TE in patients with AGS were directed against the α-Gal epitope. We have, for what we believe to be the first time, investigated T and B cell responses to α-Gal carrying tick proteins in patients with AGS, which will be essential for the understanding of the immune response against an allergenic carbohydrate transmitted by ticks.

Keywords: Allergy; Immunology; Th2 response.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: MVH reports personal fees from Thermo Fisher Scientific, outside the submitted work. MS reports personal fees from ALK, CHIESI, MEDA, and AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. SP is a shareholder in Mabtech AB.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. T cell proliferation measured by dilution of CFSE.
(A) Gating strategy for proliferation of CD4+ T helper cells. (B) T cell proliferation in response to different doses of TE in patients with AGS, Friedman test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test, **P < 0.01, n = 13. (C) T cell proliferation to TE compared with unstimulated cells in patients with AGS (left, n = 35) and healthy controls (right, n = 16), Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. (D) Comparison of patients with AGS and healthy controls, Mann-Whitney U test, *P < 0.05, n = 35 (AGS) and n = 13 (controls). (E) T cell proliferation after removal of α-Gal from the TE in patients with AGS (left, n = 10) and healthy controls (right, n = 13), Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test. (F) T cell proliferation to an α-Gal containing nontick protein in patients with AGS, Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test, *P < 0.05, n = 14. Each point within the box plot represents 1 individual. Box plots represent IQR and median, whiskers extend to the farthest data points.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Cytokine expression by PBMCs in response to TE from patients with AGS and healthy controls.
(A) Representative photos of FluoroSpot wells from a patient with AGS for unstimulated cells, TE-stimulated cells, and PHA-stimulated cells. (B) IL-3, (C) IL-4, (D) IL-13, (E) IL-31, (F) IFN-γ, (G) IL-22, and (H) IL-10. Mann-Whitney U test, **P < 0.01, n = 24 (AGS, n = 23 for IL-3) and n = 8 (control). Each point within the box plot represents 1 individual. Box plots represent IQR and median, whiskers extend to the farthest data points.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Cytokine secreting cells in PBMCs from patients with AGS after stimulation with TE and deglycosylated TE.
(A) IL-3, (B) IL-4, (C) IL-13, (D) IL-31, (E) IFN-γ, (F) IL-22, and (G) IL-10. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test. *P < 0.05, and **P < 0.01. n = 14 for all except IL-22, where n = 11. Each point within the box plot represents 1 individual. Box plots represent IQR and median, whiskers extend to the farthest data points.
Figure 4
Figure 4. B cell expression of CD23.
(A) Gating strategy for CD23-expressing B cells. (B) CD23 expression in unstimulated compared with TE stimulated B cells in patients with AGS (left, n = 30) and healthy controls (right, n = 18), Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test, ***P < 0.001. (C) Comparison of patients with AGS and healthy controls, Mann-Whitney U test, *P < 0.05, n = 30 (AGS) and n = 18 (controls). (D) Effect of inhibition with anti-CD40L and anti-IL-4 antibodies in patients with AGS, Friedman test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, n = 19. (E) Effect of removing α-Gal from the TE in patients with AGS (left, n = 9), and healthy controls (right, n = 13), Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test, **P < 0.01. (F) Comparison of CD23 expression in unstimulated B cells compared with B cells stimulated with an α-Gal containing nontick protein in patients with AGS (left, n = 21) and healthy controls (right, n = 15). (G) Comparison of CD23 expression by naive (CD27-IgD+) and memory (CD27+) B cells after TE stimulation in patients with AGS, Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test, ***P < 0.001, n = 17. Each point within the box plot represents 1 individual. Box plots represent IQR and median, whiskers extend to the farthest data points. (H) Correlation of T cell proliferation and CD23 expression in response to TE in patients with AGS, Spearman’s rank correlation, ρ = 0.792, P < 0.001, n = 19. Each point represents 1 individual.
Figure 5
Figure 5. B cell proliferation measured by CFSE dilution.
(A) Gating strategy for proliferation of CD3-CD19+ B cells. (B) Proliferation of unstimulated compared with TE stimulated B cells in patients with AGS (left, n = 28) and healthy controls (right, n = 15), Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001. (C) Comparison of patients with AGS and individuals acting as healthy controls, Mann-Whitney U test, ***P < 0.001, n = 28 (AGS) and n = 15 (controls). (D) Effect of removing α-Gal from the TE in patients with AGS (left, n = 10) and individuals acting as healthy controls (right, n = 13), Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test, *P < 0.05. (E) B cell proliferation in response to different doses of TE in patients with AGS, Friedman test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, n = 22. (F) Effect of inhibition with anti-CD40L and anti-IL-4 antibodies in patients with AGS, Friedman test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test, **P < 0.01, n = 16. (G) Comparison of B cell proliferation in unstimulated cells and cells stimulated with an α-Gal containing nontick protein in patients with AGS (left, n = 20) and individuals acting as healthy controls (right, n = 10), Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test, *P < 0.05. (H) Comparison of proliferation in naive (CD27-IgD+) and memory (CD27+) B cells in patients with AGS, Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test, n = 28). Each point within the box plot represents 1 individual. Box plots represent IQR and median, whiskers extend to the farthest data points.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Patient antibody responses to TE.
(A) Binding of a serum pool sample from a patient with AGS (n = 8) in a Western blot. MM = molecular marker, TE = tick extract, deglycoTE = deglycosylated TE, Enz. = α-galactosidase from green coffee bean. (B) Inhibition of IgE and IgG1 antibody binding to tick extract by α-Gal in patients with AGS. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test, ***P < 0.001, for IgE n = 14, for IgG1 n = 23. Each pair of points connected by a line represents 1 individual. (C) Correlation of the inhibition of IgE and IgG1 antibody binding to TE by α-Gal. Spearman’s correlation coefficient ρ = 0.609, P < 0.05, n = 14. Each point represents 1 individual.

References

    1. Swei A, et al. Patterns, drivers, and challenges of vector-borne disease emergence. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2020;20(3):159–170. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2018.2432. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rochlin I, Toledo A. Emerging tick-borne pathogens of public health importance: a mini-review. J Med Microbiol. 2020;69(6):781–791. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001206. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kitsou C, et al. Tick host immunity: vector immunomodulation and acquired tick resistance. Trends Immunol. 2021;42(7):554–574. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2021.05.005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van Nunen SA, et al. An association between tick bite reactions and red meat allergy in humans. Med J Aust. 2009;190(9):510–511. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2009.tb02533.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hamsten C, et al. Red meat allergy in Sweden: association with tick sensitization and B-negative blood groups. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;132(6):1431–1434. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.07.050. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Supplementary concepts