No-Test Medication Abortion: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 36701607
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005016
No-Test Medication Abortion: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Objective: To summarize the effectiveness and safety outcomes of medication abortion performed without prior pelvic examination or ultrasonogram ("no-test medication abortion").
Data sources: We searched the MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane (including ClinicalTrials.gov), CINAHL, Global Index Medicus, and CAB Direct databases to identify relevant studies published before April 2022 using a peer-reviewed search strategy including terms such as "medication abortion" and "ultrasonography." We contacted experts in the field for unpublished data and ongoing studies.
Methods of study selection: We reviewed 2,423 studies using Colandr. We included studies if they presented clinical outcomes of medication abortion performed with mifepristone and misoprostol and without prior pelvic examination or ultrasonogram. We excluded studies with duplicate data. We abstracted successful abortion rates overall, as well as rates by gestational age through 63 days, 70 days and past 84 days. We abstracted complication rates, including the need for surgical evacuation, additional medications, blood transfusion, and ectopic pregnancy.
Tabulation, integration and results: We included 21 studies with a total of 10,693 patients with outcome data reported. The overall efficacy of no-test medication abortion was 96.4%; 93.8% (95% CI 92.8-94.6%) through 63 days of gestation and 95.2% (95% CI 94.7-95.7%) through 70 days of gestation. The overall rate of surgical evacuation was 4.4% (95% CI 4.0-4.9), need for additional misoprostol 2.2% (95% CI 1.8-2.6), blood transfusion 0.5% (95% CI 0.3-0.6), and ectopic pregnancy 0.06% (95% CI 0.02-0.15).
Conclusion: Medication abortion performed without prior pelvic examination or ultrasonogram is a safe and effective option for pregnancy termination.
Systematic review registration: PROSPERO, CRD42021240739.
Copyright © 2022 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Financial Disclosure Bliss Kaneshiro received research support from Contramed Pharmaceuticals (Sebela Pharmaceuticals), Evofem Biosciences, Gynuity Health Projects, and the National Institutes of Health. She is a consultant for UpToDate and a trainer for Nexplanon (Merck). The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Medical abortion with mifepristone and vaginal misoprostol between 64 and 70 days' gestation.Contraception. 2019 Sep;100(3):178-181. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 May 16. Contraception. 2019. PMID: 31102629
-
Comparison of No-Test Telehealth and In-Person Medication Abortion.JAMA. 2024 Sep 17;332(11):898-905. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.10680. JAMA. 2024. PMID: 38913394 Free PMC article.
-
Expulsion at home for early medical abortion: A systematic review with meta-analyses.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Apr;100(4):727-735. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14025. Epub 2020 Nov 28. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021. PMID: 33063314
-
Mifepristone and Misoprostol for Undesired Pregnancy of Unknown Location.Obstet Gynecol. 2022 May 1;139(5):771-780. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004756. Epub 2022 Apr 5. Obstet Gynecol. 2022. PMID: 35576336 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of medical abortion prior to 6 gestational weeks: a systematic review.Contraception. 2018 Feb;97(2):90-99. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.09.006. Epub 2017 Sep 18. Contraception. 2018. PMID: 28935220
Cited by
-
Innovation through telemedicine to improve medication abortion access in primary health centers: findings from a pilot study in Musanze District, Rwanda.BMC Public Health. 2025 May 7;25(1):1681. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22629-z. BMC Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40335961 Free PMC article.
-
Perspectives on Abortion Services, the Pre-Abortion Visit, and Telemedicine Abortion: A Qualitative Study in Sweden.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2025 Mar;57(1):36-44. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12290. Epub 2025 Jan 12. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2025. PMID: 39800999 Free PMC article.
-
Home use of mifepristone for medical abortion: a systematic review.BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2025 Jul 10;51(3):221-231. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2024-202302. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2025. PMID: 39384382 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kortsmit K, Jatlaoui TC, Mandel MG, Reeves JA, Oduyebo T, Petersen E, et al. Abortion surveillance—United States, 2018. MMWR Surveill Summ 2020;69:1–29. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6907a1 - DOI
-
- Medication abortion up to 70 days of gestation. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 225. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2020;136:e31–47. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004082 - DOI
-
- National Abortion Federation. Clinical policy guidelines for abortion care: 2020. Accessed August 25, 2020. https://5aa1b2xfmfh2e2mk03kk8rsx-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uplo...
-
- World Health Organization, Human Reproduction Programme. Abortion care guideline. Clinical services recommendation 10: pre-abortion ultrasound scanning (3.3.5). Accessed May 25, 2022. https://srhr.org/abortioncare/chapter-3/pre-abortion-3-3/clinical-servic...
-
- Kulier R, Kapp N. Comprehensive analysis of the use of pre-procedure ultrasound for first- and second-trimester abortion. Contraception 2011;83:30–3. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.06.014 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous