Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 Jan 26;23(1):65.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05396-w.

Predictors of successful vaginal birth after a cesarean section in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Predictors of successful vaginal birth after a cesarean section in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Birye Dessalegn Mekonnen et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: The rates of successful vaginal birth after previous cesarean section (VBAC) have been increasing with minimal complication. Successful vaginal birth after cesarean section improves maternal and fetal outcomes by shortening the length of hospital stay, avoiding abdominal surgery, decreasing the risk of infections and hemorrhage, and decreasing injury of the bladder and bowel. Despite a few single studies stating different predictors of successful VBAC, there is a lack of nationwide data to show the determinants of successful VBAC. Thus, this meta-analysis aimed to determine the predictors of successful VBAC in Ethiopia.

Methods: A systematic literature search was performed from PubMed, Web of Sciences, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Google scholar until July 25, 2022. The quality of included studies was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist. The analysis was executed using Stata 14 statistical software. Heterogeneity was evaluated statistically using Cochran's Q-statistic and quantified by the I2 value. A random-effects model was used to estimate the determinants of successful vaginal birth after a cesarean section if substantial heterogeneity was detected across included studies; otherwise, a fixed-effects model was used.

Results: Women living in rural residence (AOR: 2.14; 95% CI: 1.01, 4.52), history of previous spontaneous vaginal delivery (AOR: 2.92; 95% CI: 2.02, 4.23), previous successful vaginal birth after previous cesarean section (AOR: 5.29; 95% CI: 2.20, 12.69), history of stillbirth (AOR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.20, 2.04), cervical dilation of ≥ 4 cm at admission (AOR: 2.14; 95% CI: 1.27, 3.61), spontaneous ruptured membranes at admission (AOR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.17, 1.48) were independent determinants of successful vaginal birth after previous cesarean section.

Conclusion: The results of this meta-analysis showed that successful VBAC was influenced by past and present obstetric conditions and other predictors. Thus, it is recommended that obstetric care providers should emphasize those factors that lead to successful vaginal birth during counseling and optimal selection of women for the trial of labour after cesarean section.

Systematic review and meta-analysis registration: PROSPERO CRD42022329567.

Keywords: Systematic review; Vaginal birth after cesarean section.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram of study selection for the meta-analysis of predictors of VBAC in Ethiopia
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plot of the association between residence and successful VBAC
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Forest plot of the association between a history of previous spontaneous vaginal delivery and successful VBAC
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Forest plot showing the association between previous successful VBAC and successful VBAC
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Forest plot showing the association between history of stillbirth and successful VBAC
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Forest plot showing the association between cervical dilation of ≥ 4 cm at admission and successful VBAC
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Forest plot showing the association between spontaneous ruptured membranes and successful VBAC

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Betrán AP, Torloni MR, Zhang J-J, Gülmezoglu A, Aleem H, Althabe F, et al. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. BJOG. 2016;123(5):667. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13526. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mirteymouri M, Ayati S, Pourali L, Mahmoodinia M, Mahmoodinia M. Evaluation of maternal-neonatal outcomes in vaginal birth after cesarean delivery referred to maternity of academic hospitals. J Family Reprod Health. 2016;10(4):206. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Betran AP, Ye J, Moller A-B, Souza JP, Zhang J. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(6):e005671. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005671. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gedefaw G, Demis A, Alemnew B, Wondmieneh A, Getie A, Waltengus F. Prevalence, indications, and outcomes of caesarean section deliveries in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Patient Saf Surg. 2020;14(1):1–10. doi: 10.1186/s13037-020-00236-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marshall NE, Fu R, Guise JM. Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: a systematic review. Am J Obstetr Gynecol. 2011;205(3):262. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.035. - DOI - PubMed