UK government's new placement legislation is a 'good first step': a rapid qualitative analysis of consumer, business, enforcement and health stakeholder perspectives
- PMID: 36703194
- PMCID: PMC9878939
- DOI: 10.1186/s12916-023-02726-9
UK government's new placement legislation is a 'good first step': a rapid qualitative analysis of consumer, business, enforcement and health stakeholder perspectives
Abstract
Background: The current food system in England promotes a population diet that is high in fat, sugar and salt (HFSS). To address this, the UK government has implemented legislation to restrict the promotion of HFSS products in prominent locations (e.g. store entrances, checkouts) in qualifying retailers since October 2022. This study investigated the perceived impact of the legislation for affected stakeholders.
Methods: A pre-implementation rapid qualitative evaluation of stakeholder interviews. One hundred eight UK stakeholders participated in the study including 34 consumers, 24 manufacturers and retailers, 22 local authority enforcement officers and 28 academic and charitable health representatives. A participatory conference was used to enable policy recommendations to be confirmed by stakeholders.
Results: Stakeholders perceived the legislation to be a 'good first step' towards improving population diet but recognised this needed to be considered amongst a range of long-term obesity policies. Areas of further support were identified and these are presented as six recommendations for government to support the successful implementation of the legislation: (1) provide a free central HFSS calculator, (2) refine legislation to enhance intent and clarity, (3) conduct a robust evaluation to assess intended and unintended outcomes, (4) provide greater support for smaller businesses, (5) provide ring-fenced resources to local authorities and (6) create and communicate a long-term roadmap for food and health.
Conclusions: This legislation has the potential to reduce impulse HFSS purchases and makes a solid start towards creating healthier retail outlets for consumers. Immediate government actions to create a freely accessible HFSS calculator, support smaller businesses and provide additional resources to local authorities would support successful implementation and enforcement. Independent evaluation of the implementation of the legislation will enable monitoring of potential unintended consequences identified in this study and support refinement of the legislation. A long-term roadmap is necessary to outline strategies to support equal access to healthier and sustainable food across the whole food system within the next 20-30 years.
Keywords: Food policy; HFSS foods; Placement legislation; Qualitative research; Retail food environment; Stakeholder views.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
CV, PD and JB have a non-financial research collaboration with a UK supermarket chain. All authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.
Figures
Similar articles
-
"If government is saying the regulations are important, they should be putting in funding to back it up."- An in-depth analysis of local authority officers' perspectives of the Food (Promotion and Placement) (England) Regulations 2021.BMC Med. 2024 Nov 6;22(1):514. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03720-5. BMC Med. 2024. PMID: 39506702 Free PMC article.
-
Diet and health inequalities: Connecting with vulnerable groups to address food insecurity-the DIO food project.Nutr Bull. 2024 Dec;49(4):561-571. doi: 10.1111/nbu.12709. Epub 2024 Sep 25. Nutr Bull. 2024. PMID: 39323017
-
Expert views on high fat, salt and sugar food marketing policies to tackle obesity and improve dietary behaviours in the UK: a qualitative study.BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 9;23(1):1951. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16821-2. BMC Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37814236 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review of factors that influence food store owner and manager decision making and ability or willingness to use choice architecture and marketing mix strategies to encourage healthy consumer purchases in the United States, 2005-2017.Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Jan 14;16(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0767-8. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019. PMID: 30642352 Free PMC article.
-
Towards a regulation of food advertising?Proc Nutr Soc. 2022 Dec;81(4):265-271. doi: 10.1017/S0029665122001926. Epub 2022 Aug 10. Proc Nutr Soc. 2022. PMID: 35946114 Review.
Cited by
-
What does it take for healthy food retail programmes to be successful? Lessons learned in New York City.Public Health Nutr. 2024 Oct 3;27(1):e188. doi: 10.1017/S1368980024001368. Public Health Nutr. 2024. PMID: 39360456 Free PMC article.
-
Choice architecture promotes sustainable choices in online food-delivery apps.PNAS Nexus. 2024 Sep 19;3(10):pgae422. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae422. eCollection 2024 Oct. PNAS Nexus. 2024. PMID: 39372540 Free PMC article.
-
Real-life experiments in supermarkets to encourage healthy dietary-related behaviours: opportunities, challenges and lessons learned.Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023 Jun 20;20(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01448-8. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023. PMID: 37340326 Free PMC article.
-
Implementation of a UK supermarket intervention to increase purchasing of fresh fruit and vegetables: process evaluation of the WRAPPED natural experiment.Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Nov 11;21(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01679-3. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024. PMID: 39529139 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Can nudge interventions targeting healthy food purchases in real-world grocery stores reduce diet-related health disparities? A pooled analysis of four controlled trials.Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Dec 3;21(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01687-3. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024. PMID: 39627771 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Dimbleby H. The National Food Strategy independent review: the plan. 2021.
-
- Obesity Health Alliance . Turning the tide: a 10-year healthy weight strategy. 2021.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical