Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 27;15(1):5.
doi: 10.1186/s13073-023-01157-8.

The genomic landscape of rare disorders in the Middle East

Affiliations

The genomic landscape of rare disorders in the Middle East

Maha El Naofal et al. Genome Med. .

Abstract

Background: Rare diseases collectively impose a significant burden on healthcare systems, especially in underserved regions, like the Middle East, which lack access to genomic diagnostic services and the associated personalized management plans.

Methods: We established a clinical genomics and genetic counseling facility, within a multidisciplinary tertiary pediatric center, in the United Arab Emirates to locally diagnose and manage patients with rare diseases. Clinical genomic investigations included exome-based sequencing, chromosomal microarrays, and/or targeted testing. We assessed the diagnostic yield and implications for clinical management among this population. Variables were compared using the Fisher exact test. Tests were 2-tailed, and P < .05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: We present data on 1000 patients with rare diseases (46.2% females; average age, 4.6 years) representing 47 countries primarily from the Arabian Peninsula, the Levant, Africa, and Asia. The cumulative diagnostic yield was 32.5% (95% CI, 29.7-35.5%) and was higher for genomic sequencing-based testing than chromosomal microarrays (37.9% versus 17.2%, P = 0.0001) across all indications, consistent with the higher burden of single gene disorders. Of the 221 Mendelian disorders identified in this cohort, the majority (N = 184) were encountered only once, and those with recessive inheritance accounted for ~ 62% of sequencing diagnoses. Of patients with positive genetic findings (N = 325), 67.7% were less than 5 years of age, and 60% were offered modified management and/or intervention plans. Interestingly, 24% of patients with positive genetic findings received delayed diagnoses (average age, 12.4 years; range 7-37 years), most likely due to a lack of access to genomic investigations in this region. One such genetic finding ended a 15-year-long diagnostic odyssey, leading to a life-threatening diagnosis in one patient, who was then successfully treated using an experimental allogenic bone marrow transplant. Finally, we present cases with candidate genes within regions of homozygosity, likely underlying novel recessive disorders.

Conclusions: Early access to genomic diagnostics for patients with suspected rare disorders in the Middle East is likely to improve clinical outcomes while driving gene discovery in this genetically underrepresented population.

Keywords: Clinical utility; Diagnostic yield; Genomics; Middle East; Rare diseases; Whole-exome sequencing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Cohort summary. A Distribution of patients’ origins by geographical regions. The bracket denotes patients of Arab origins, in the Middle East and North Africa, whose distribution by country is shown in B. Note that other Arabs (N = 53) of unknown countries of origin in A are not included on the map
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Diagnostic yield, rare disease frequency, and inheritance patterns. A Distribution of patients and diagnostic yield by age and gender. B Frequencies of rare diseases (N = 221) observed in this cohort. Most diseases (> 180) are seen only once. C Breakdown of inheritance patterns of diagnoses for cases with positive findings by sequencing (six cases had dual diagnoses and were counted twice in this figure)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Age distribution of patients with positive findings who received modified management and/or intervention plans

References

    1. Nguengang Wakap S, Lambert DM, Olry A, et al. Estimating cumulative point prevalence of rare diseases: analysis of the Orphanet database. Eur J Hum Genet. 2019;28(2):165–173. doi: 10.1038/s41431-019-0508-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rare disease facts - global genes. Accessed August 22, 2022. https://globalgenes.org/rare-disease-facts/.
    1. Navarrete-Opazo AA, Singh M, Tisdale A, Cutillo CM, Garrison SR. Can you hear us now? The impact of health-care utilization by rare disease patients in the United States. Genet Med. 2021;23(11):2194–2201. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01241-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tisdale A, Cutillo CM, Nathan R, et al. The IDeaS Initiative: pilot study to assess the impact of rare diseases on patients and healthcare systems. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021;16(1):1–18. doi: 10.1186/S13023-021-02061-3/FIGURES/6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abou Tayoun AN, Rehm HL. Genetic variation in the Middle East—an opportunity to advance the human genetics field. Genome Med. 2020;12(1):1–4. doi: 10.1186/S13073-020-00821-7/FIGURES/1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types