Root Fracture Resistance of Maxillary Premolars Obturated with Three Root Canal Sealers after Passive Utrasonic Irrigation: An in Vitro study
- PMID: 36703808
- PMCID: PMC9709848
- DOI: 10.22037/iej.v15i3.26426
Root Fracture Resistance of Maxillary Premolars Obturated with Three Root Canal Sealers after Passive Utrasonic Irrigation: An in Vitro study
Abstract
Introduction: Maxillary premolars, may be more susceptible to fracture due to their anatomy; especially when there is loss of tooth structure. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate materials and techniques that may increase fracture resistance during and post root canal treatment. This in vitro study aimed to evaluate root fracture resistance of maxillary premolars when filled with three root canal sealers as well as whether this resistance would be increased by passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI).
Methods and materials: Sixty-four maxillary premolars with two roots were randomly divided into one negative control group (intact canals; n = 8), one positive control group (instrumented, unsealed canals; n = 8), and six experimental groups (n = 8), which were instrumented with ProTaper Next rotary system up to X2 file and subdivided according to final irrigation (with or without PUI) and type of sealer used (AH-Plus [AH], MTA Fillapex [MTA], or EndoSequence BC Sealer [ES]). The specimens were subjected to fracture strength test in a universal testing machine at a speed of 1 mm/min until fracture. The maximum force required to induce fracture was recorded (N). The Kruskal-Wallis test and DUNN test were used for analysis.
Results: The lowest force required to cause root fracture was observed in the positive control group (310.48 ± 54.08 N); this was significantly different from the other groups (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between experimental groups obturated with the same sealer, whether with or without PUI (AH with PUI: 558.80 ± 87.12 N; AH without PUI: 508.75 ± 97.55 N; MTA with PUI: 507.27 ± 174.55 N; MTA without PUI: 516.69 ± 96.56 N; ES with PUI: 526.76 ± 143.97 N; ES without PUI: 628.40 ± 94.74 N) (P > 0.05). There was also no significant difference between the experimental groups and the negative control group (P > 0.05).
Conclusions: In this in vitro study PUI did not increase the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars, while AH Plus, MTA Fillapex, EndoSequence sealers increased fracture resistance of instrumented root canals.
Keywords: Endodontically Treated Teeth; Fracture Strength; Root Canal Obturation; Root Canal Preparation; Smear Layer.
Conflict of interest statement
‘None declared’.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of the effect of different root canal obturation techniques using two root canal sealers on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots.Microsc Res Tech. 2015 May;78(5):404-7. doi: 10.1002/jemt.22487. Epub 2015 Mar 4. Microsc Res Tech. 2015. PMID: 25736551
-
Comparative Evaluation of Root Reinforcement Using MTA-based, Epoxy Resin-based, and Silicone-based Endodontic Sealers in Canals Instrumented with Single-file Rotary System: An In Vitro Study.J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 Oct 1;22(10):1098-1104. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021. PMID: 35197375
-
Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Obturated with Different Root Canal Sealers (A Comparative Study).J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 May 1;21(5):490-493. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020. PMID: 32690829
-
Data on the push-out bond strength of three different root canal treatment sealers.Bioinformation. 2021 Jan 31;17(1):67-72. doi: 10.6026/97320630017067. eCollection 2021. Bioinformation. 2021. PMID: 34393420 Free PMC article.
-
Dentinal tubule penetration of AH Plus, iRoot SP, MTA fillapex, and guttaflow bioseal root canal sealers after different final irrigation procedures: A confocal microscopic study.Lasers Surg Med. 2016 Jan;48(1):70-6. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22446. Epub 2016 Jan 12. Lasers Surg Med. 2016. PMID: 26774730
Cited by
-
Comparative assessment of vertical fracture resistance in endodontically treated roots with different obturating systems and techniques: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of in vitro studies.BMC Oral Health. 2024 Nov 27;24(1):1439. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05111-x. BMC Oral Health. 2024. PMID: 39604933 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of radiotherapy dose and application time on the load-to-failure values of teeth filled with different sealers.BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 21;24(1):1260. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05029-4. BMC Oral Health. 2024. PMID: 39434091 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Jafari Navimipour E, Ebrahimi Chaharom ME, Alizadeh Oskoee P, Mohammadi N, Bahari M, Firouzmandi M. Fracture resistance of endodontically-treated maxillary premolars restored with composite resin along with glass fiber insertion in different positions. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2012;6(4):125–30. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Mohammadi N, Kahnamoii MA, Yeganeh PK, Navimipour EJ. Effect of fiber post and cusp coverage on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars directly restored with composite resin. J Endod. 2009;35(10):1428–32. - PubMed
-
- Cohen S, Berman LH, Blanco L, Bakland L, Kim JS. A demographic analysis of vertical root fractures. J Endod. 2006;32(12):1160–3. - PubMed
-
- Topcuoglu HS, Tuncay O, Karatas E, Arslan H, Yeter K. In vitro fracture resistance of roots obturated with epoxy resin-based, mineral trioxide aggregate-based, and bioceramic root canal sealers. J Endod. 2013;39(12):1630–3. - PubMed
-
- Saber Sel D, Hashem AA. Efficacy of different final irrigation activation techniques on smear layer removal. J Endod. 2011;37(9):1272–5. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources