Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 10:4:1063324.
doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.1063324. eCollection 2022.

Disagreements in physical activity monitor validation study guidelines create challenges in conducting validity studies

Myles W O'Brien  1   2 , Liam P Pellerine  3 , Madeline E Shivgulam  3 , Derek S Kimmerly  3
Affiliations

Disagreements in physical activity monitor validation study guidelines create challenges in conducting validity studies

Myles W O'Brien et al. Front Digit Health. .
No abstract available

Keywords: accuracy; frameworks; harmonization; statistical analysis; wearable technology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Aspects that are consistent and divergent between physical activity monitor validation recommendations (–8). This figure depicts the considerations that may impact an individual researcher planning on conducting a monitor validation study, with checkmarks and “x” marks indicating consistent and divergent recommendations, respectively.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Welk G, Bai Y, Lee JM, Godino JOB, Saint-Maurice PF, Carr L. Standardizing analytic methods and reporting in activity monitor validation studies. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (2019) 51(8):1767–80. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001966 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mühlen JM, Stang J, Lykke Skovgaard E, Judice PB, Molina-Garcia P, Johnston W, et al. Recommendations for determining the validity of consumer wearable heart rate devices: expert statement and checklist of the INTERLIVE network. Br J Sports Med. (2021) 55:767–79. 10.1136/bjsports-2020-103148 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Johnston W, Judice PB, Molina García P, Mühlen JM, Lykke Skovgaard E, Stang J, et al. Recommendations for determining the validity of consumer wearable and smartphone step count: expert statement and checklist of the INTERLIVE network. Br J Sports Med. (2021) 55:780–93. 10.1136/bjsports-2020-103147 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Keadle SK, Lyden KA, Strath SJ, Staudenmayer JW, Freedson PS. A framework to evaluate devices that assess physical behavior. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. (2019) 47(4):206–14. 10.1249/JES.0000000000000206 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Argent R, Hetherington-Rauth M, Stang J, Tarp J, Ortega FB, Molina-Garcia P, et al. Recommendations for determining the validity of consumer wearables and smartphones for the estimation of energy expenditure: expert statement and checklist of the INTERLIVE network. Sport Med. (2022) 52(8):1817–32. 10.1007/s40279-022-01665-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources