Disagreements in physical activity monitor validation study guidelines create challenges in conducting validity studies
- PMID: 36703940
- PMCID: PMC9871762
- DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.1063324
Disagreements in physical activity monitor validation study guidelines create challenges in conducting validity studies
Keywords: accuracy; frameworks; harmonization; statistical analysis; wearable technology.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures

References
-
- Mühlen JM, Stang J, Lykke Skovgaard E, Judice PB, Molina-Garcia P, Johnston W, et al. Recommendations for determining the validity of consumer wearable heart rate devices: expert statement and checklist of the INTERLIVE network. Br J Sports Med. (2021) 55:767–79. 10.1136/bjsports-2020-103148 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Johnston W, Judice PB, Molina García P, Mühlen JM, Lykke Skovgaard E, Stang J, et al. Recommendations for determining the validity of consumer wearable and smartphone step count: expert statement and checklist of the INTERLIVE network. Br J Sports Med. (2021) 55:780–93. 10.1136/bjsports-2020-103147 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Argent R, Hetherington-Rauth M, Stang J, Tarp J, Ortega FB, Molina-Garcia P, et al. Recommendations for determining the validity of consumer wearables and smartphones for the estimation of energy expenditure: expert statement and checklist of the INTERLIVE network. Sport Med. (2022) 52(8):1817–32. 10.1007/s40279-022-01665-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources