Modelling the interaction between wearable assistive devices and digital human models-A systematic review
- PMID: 36704313
- PMCID: PMC9872199
- DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1044275
Modelling the interaction between wearable assistive devices and digital human models-A systematic review
Abstract
Exoskeletons, orthoses, exosuits, assisting robots and such devices referred to as wearable assistive devices are devices designed to augment or protect the human body by applying and transmitting force. Due to the problems concerning cost- and time-consuming user tests, in addition to the possibility to test different configurations of a device, the avoidance of a prototype and many more advantages, digital human models become more and more popular for evaluating the effects of wearable assistive devices on humans. The key indicator for the efficiency of assistance is the interface between device and human, consisting mainly of the soft biological tissue. However, the soft biological tissue is mostly missing in digital human models due to their rigid body dynamics. Therefore, this systematic review aims to identify interaction modelling approaches between wearable assistive devices and digital human models and especially to study how the soft biological tissue is considered in the simulation. The review revealed four interaction modelling approaches, which differ in their accuracy to recreate the occurring interactions in reality. Furthermore, within these approaches there are some incorporating the appearing relative motion between device and human body due to the soft biological tissue in the simulation. The influence of the soft biological tissue on the force transmission due to energy absorption on the other side is not considered in any publication yet. Therefore, the development of an approach to integrate the viscoelastic behaviour of soft biological tissue in the digital human models could improve the design of the wearable assistive devices and thus increase its efficiency and efficacy.
Keywords: digital human model; interaction modelling; multi-body dynamic; musculoskeletal modelling; soft tissue; systematic review; wearable assistive device.
Copyright © 2023 Scherb, Wartzack and Miehling.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Physical interface dynamics alter how robotic exosuits augment human movement: implications for optimizing wearable assistive devices.J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 May 18;14(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0247-9. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017. PMID: 28521803 Free PMC article.
-
Active Fabrics With Controllable Stiffness for Robotic Assistive Interfaces.Adv Mater. 2024 Aug;36(32):e2404502. doi: 10.1002/adma.202404502. Epub 2024 Jun 6. Adv Mater. 2024. PMID: 38822632
-
Differential Soft Sensor-Based Measurement of Interactive Force and Assistive Torque for a Robotic Hip Exoskeleton.Sensors (Basel). 2021 Sep 30;21(19):6545. doi: 10.3390/s21196545. Sensors (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34640867 Free PMC article.
-
A review of soft wearable robots that provide active assistance: Trends, common actuation methods, fabrication, and applications.Wearable Technol. 2020 Sep 14;1:e3. doi: 10.1017/wtc.2020.4. eCollection 2020. Wearable Technol. 2020. PMID: 39050264 Free PMC article. Review.
-
EEG-Based BCI Control Schemes for Lower-Limb Assistive-Robots.Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Aug 6;12:312. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00312. eCollection 2018. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018. PMID: 30127730 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of subject-specific musculoskeletal model calibration strategies on muscle force and fatigue estimation.J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025 Jul 10;22(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12984-025-01691-z. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025. PMID: 40640829 Free PMC article.
-
Quantification of the Mechanical Properties in the Human-Exoskeleton Upper Arm Interface During Overhead Work Postures in Healthy Young Adults.Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jul 25;25(15):4605. doi: 10.3390/s25154605. Sensors (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40807771 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the static and dynamic assistive torque of a passive upper limb occupational exoskeleton.Wearable Technol. 2025 Apr 15;6:e19. doi: 10.1017/wtc.2025.8. eCollection 2025. Wearable Technol. 2025. PMID: 40297058 Free PMC article.
-
Springs vs. motors: Ideal assistance in the lower limbs during walking at different speeds.PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Sep 4;20(9):e1011837. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011837. eCollection 2024 Sep. PLoS Comput Biol. 2024. PMID: 39231195 Free PMC article.
-
The Determination of Assistance-as-Needed Support by an Ankle-Foot Orthosis for Patients with Foot Drop.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Aug 30;20(17):6687. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20176687. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37681827 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Afschrift M., Groote F. de, Schutter J. de, Jonkers I. (2014). The effect of muscle weakness on the capability gap during gross motor function: A simulation study supporting design criteria for exoskeletons of the lower limb. Biomed. Eng. Online 13, 111. 10.1186/1475-925X-13-111 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- AnyBody Technology (2022). The AnyBody modeling system (version 7.4.x). Available from: http://www.anybodytech.com .
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources