Individual risk prediction of high grade prostate cancer based on the combination between total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and free to total PSA ratio
- PMID: 36704961
- DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2023-0008
Individual risk prediction of high grade prostate cancer based on the combination between total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and free to total PSA ratio
Abstract
Objectives: Clinical practice guidelines endorse the stratification of prostate cancer (PCa) risk according to individual total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) values and age to enhance the individual risk-benefit ratio. We defined two nomograms to predict the individual risk of high and low grade PCa by combining the assay of tPSA and %free/tPSA (%f/tPSA) in patients with a pre-biopsy tPSA between 2 and 10 μg/L.
Methods: The study cohort consisted of 662 patients that had fPSA, tPSA, and a biopsy performed (41.3% with a final diagnosis of PCa). Logistic regression including age, tPSA and %f/tPSA was used to model the probability of having high or low grade cancer by defining 3 outcome levels: no PCa, low grade (International Society of Urological Pathology grade, ISUP<3) and high grade PCa (ISUP≥3).
Results: The nomogram identifying patients with: (a) high vs. those with low grade PCa and without the disease showed a good discriminating capability (∼80%), but the calibration showed a risk of underestimation for predictive probabilities >30% (a considerable critical threshold of risk), (b) ISUP<3 vs. those without the disease showed a discriminating capability of 63% and overestimates predictive probabilities >50%. In ISUP 5 a possible loss of PSA immunoreactivity has been observed.
Conclusions: The estimated risk of high or low grade PCa by the nomograms may be of aid in the decision-making process, in particular in the case of critical comorbidities and when the digital rectal examinations are inconclusive. The improved characterization of the risk of ISUP≥3 might enhance the use for magnetic resonance imaging in this setting.
Keywords: high grade; nomogram; risk; risk-benefit ratio; rule-in.
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.
References
-
- Mottet, N, van den Bergh, RCN, Briers, E, Van den Broeck, T, Cumberbatch, MG, De Santis, M, et al.. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer-2020 update. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol 2021;79:243–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.042 . - DOI
-
- Ferraro, S, Bussetti, M, Panteghini, M. Serum prostate-specific antigen testing for early detection of prostate cancer: managing the gap between clinical and laboratory practice. Clin Chem 2021;67:602–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvab002 . - DOI
-
- Vickers, AJ. Redesigning prostate cancer screening strategies to reduce overdiagnosis. Clin Chem 2019;65:39–41. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2018.287094 . - DOI
-
- Schröder, F, Kattan, MW. The comparability of models for predicting the risk of a positive prostate biopsy with prostate-specific antigen alone: a systematic review. Eur Urol 2008;54:274–90.
-
- Nam, RK, Toi, A, Klotz, LH, Trachtenberg, J, Jewett, MA, Appu, S, et al.. Assessing individual risk for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:3582–8. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2007.10.6450 . - DOI
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
