Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Dec;23 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):e13743.
doi: 10.1002/acm2.13743.

Radiation biology workforce in the United States

Affiliations
Review

Radiation biology workforce in the United States

Jacqueline P Williams et al. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

In recent decades, the principal goals of participants in the field of radiation biologists have included defining dose thresholds for cancer and non-cancer endpoints to be used by regulators, clinicians and industry, as well as informing on best practice radiation utilization and protection applications. Importantly, much of this work has required an intimate relationship between "bench" radiation biology scientists and their target audiences (such as physicists, medical practitioners and epidemiologists) in order to ensure that the requisite gaps in knowledge are adequately addressed. However, despite the growing risk for public exposure to higher-than-background levels of radiation, e.g. from long-distance travel, the increasing use of ionizing radiation during medical procedures, the threat from geopolitical instability, and so forth, there has been a dramatic decline in the number of qualified radiation biologists in the U.S. Contributing factors are thought to include the loss of applicable training programs, loss of jobs, and declining opportunities for advancement. This report was undertaken in order to begin addressing this situation since inaction may threaten the viability of radiation biology as a scientific discipline.

Keywords: radiation biology; workforce.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Coleman CN, Stone HB, Alexander GA, et al. Education and training for radiation scientists: radiation research program and American Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Workshop, Bethesda, Maryland, May 12–14, 2003. Radiat Res. 2003;160(6):729‐737. - PubMed
    1. Rosenstein BS, Held KD, Rockwell S, Williams JP, Zeman EL. American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) survey of radiation biology educators in U.S. and Canadian radiation oncology residency programs. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;75(3):896‐905. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fowler JF. Development of radiobiology for oncology—a personal view. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51(13):R263‐R286. - PubMed
    1. Cho K, Imaoka T, Klokov D, et al. Funding for radiation research: past, present, and future. Int J Radiat Biol. 2019;95(7):816‐840. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Steinberg M, McBride WH, Vlashi E, Pajonk F. National institutes of health funding in radiation oncology: a snapshot. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;86(2):234‐240. - PMC - PubMed