Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun;38(6):793-802.
doi: 10.1007/s00380-023-02238-9. Epub 2023 Jan 27.

Risk factor structure of heart failure in patients with cancer after treatment with anticancer agents' assessment by big data from a Japanese electronic health record

Affiliations

Risk factor structure of heart failure in patients with cancer after treatment with anticancer agents' assessment by big data from a Japanese electronic health record

Shoichiro Nohara et al. Heart Vessels. 2023 Jun.

Abstract

As the prognosis of cancer patients has been improved, comorbidity of heart failure (HF) in cancer survivors is a serious concern, especially in the aged population. This study aimed to examine the risk factors of HF development after treatment by anticancer agents, using a machine learning-based analysis of a massive dataset obtained from the electronic health record (EHR) in Japan. This retrospective, cohort study, using a dataset from 2008 to 2017 in the Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) database in Japan, enrolled 140,327 patients. The structure of risk factors was determined using multivariable analysis and classification and regression tree (CART) algorithm for time-to-event data. The mean follow-up period was 1.55 years. The prevalence of HF after anticancer agent administration were 4.0%. HF was more prevalent in the older than the younger. As the presence of cardiovascular diseases and various risk factors predicted HF, CART analysis of the risk factors revealed that the risk factor structures complicatedly differed among different age groups. The highest risk combination was hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and atrial fibrillation in the group aged ≤ 64 years, and the presence of ischemic heart disease was a key in both groups aged 65-74 years and 75 ≤ years. The machine learning-based approach was able to develop complicated HF risk structures in cancer patients after anticancer agents in different age population, of which knowledge would be essential for realizing precision medicine to improve the prognosis of cancer patients.

Keywords: Anticancer agents; Electronic health record; Epidemiology; Heart failure; Machine learning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Enrollment of patients treated for cancer and identification of incidences of HF in this study. Patients with cancer were enrolled in this study on the first day of anticancer agent administration. Patients with or without HF diagnosis were selected as depicted
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Cumulative probability of HF after anticancer treatment stratified by age. Cumulative probability of HF within 5 years of anticancer therapy in different age groups:  ≤ 64 years, 65–74 years, and  ≥ 75 years
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
CART analysis of risk factors for HF development. Risk factors for HF development in indicated age groups according to CART analysis. Patients were stratified according to the presence (y) or absence (n) of the corresponding risk factors. The number (N) of all patients and those who developed HF after starting the administration of anticancer agents (HF) are shown. The combinatorial risk, assessed by the relative hazard ratio (RHR), was expressed relative to the lowest hazard ratio in each age group. The combinatorial risk was stratified and color-coded into low- (1 ≤ RHR < 2, yellow), medium- (2 ≤ RHR < 3, orange), and high-risk (3 ≤ RHR, red) groups. The rightmost panels indicate RHR (red bars) and 95% confidence intervals (blue bars). *P < 0.05 and ***P < 0.001 compared to the lowest risk group (RHR = 1) in each age group
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Graphical summary of risk structures for HF development. The risk factors for HF after treatment with anticancer agents formed context-dependent structures that were distinct among different age groups

Similar articles

References

    1. Mayer DK, Nasso SF, Earp JA. Defining cancer survivors, their needs, and perspectives on survivorship health care in the USA. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:e11–e18. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30573-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Takahashi M. Cancer survivorship: current status of research, care, and policy in Japan. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016;46:599–604. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyw057. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abe R, Sakata Y, Nochioka K, Miura M, Oikawa T, Kasahara S, Sato M, Aoyanagi H, Shiroto T, Sugimura K, Takahashi J, Miyata S, Shimokawa H, Investigators C. Gender differences in prognostic relevance of self-care behaviors on mortality and hospitalization in patients with heart failure—a report from the CHART-2 Study. J Cardiol. 2019;73:370–378. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.11.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, Butler J, Casey DE, Jr, Colvin MM, Drazner MH, Filippatos GS, Fonarow GC, Givertz MM, Hollenberg SM, Lindenfeld J, Masoudi FA, McBride PE, Peterson PN, Stevenson LW, Westlake C. 2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA focused update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines and the heart failure society of America. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:776–803. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.04.025. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Minami M, Matsumoto S, Horiuchi H. Cardiovascular side-effects of modern cancer therapy. Circ J. 2010;74:1779–1786. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-10-0632. - DOI - PubMed

Substances