Long-Term Outcomes Following Transarterial Embolisation of Proximal Type I Endoleaks Post-EVAR
- PMID: 36705707
- DOI: 10.1007/s00270-022-03342-5
Long-Term Outcomes Following Transarterial Embolisation of Proximal Type I Endoleaks Post-EVAR
Abstract
Purpose: To describe the long-term outcomes following transarterial embolisation for type Ia endoleaks (ELIa) in patients who failed or were unsuitable for standard endovascular/surgical options.
Materials and methods: A retrospective single-centre observational study was performed between October 2010 and April 2018. Technical success rates and long-term outcomes were evaluated. A sub-analysis was performed comparing outcomes of covered aortic endografts and Nellix endovascular aneurysm sealing systems.
Results: A total of 34 transcatheter embolisations were performed for ELIa in 27 patients (13 endografts and 14 patients with Nellix systems). A combination of Onyx and coils was used most frequently (18/34), followed by Onyx alone (14/34) and coils alone (2/34). Technical success was achieved in 33/34 (97%) procedures . Seven early complications occurred with no immediate mortality, 5 of which involved migration/reflux of embolic into the endograft-all successfully managed via endovascular approach. Following the surveillance period (mean 25 months), 13/26 (50%) of patients were free from recurrent endoleak. Sac expansion occurred in 42% (11/26). 21/26 patients died; 6 due to aneurysm sac rupture, 10 due to unrelated causes, and 5 had no cause of death available. No significant difference in survival was found between patients with an endograft or Nellix graft-Chi-squared value - 0.011 (p < 0.05 = 3.84).
Conclusions: Transcatheter embolisation for type Ia endoleaks is a safe and effective option in a select patient cohort-where traditional endovascular and surgical options are unsuitable or have failed. The procedure may prevent recurrence in some whilst delaying rupture and death in others.
Keywords: Endovascular aortic repair; Transarterial embolisaton; Transcatheter embolisation; Type I endoleak; Type Ia endoleak.
© 2023. Crown.
References
-
- Chaikof EL, Dalman RL, Eskandari MK, et al. The society for vascular surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67(1):2-77.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.044 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kaufman JA. Vascular interventions. In: Kaufman JA, Lee MJ, editors. Vascular and interventional radiology: The Requisites. Elsevier Saunders; 2013. p. 86–95.
-
- Moll FL, Powell JT, Fraedrich G, et al. Management of abdominal aortic aneurysms clinical practice guidelines of the European society for vascular surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;41:S1e58. - DOI
-
- Harris PL, Vallabhaneni SR, Desgranges P, et al. Incidence and risk factors of late rupture, conversion, and death after endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms: the EUROSTAR experience. European collaborators on stent/graft techniques for aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2000;32:739. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ameli-Renani S, Pavlidis V, Morgan RA. Secondary endoleak management following TEVAR and EVAR. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2020;43(12):1839–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02572-9 . - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
