Comparative evaluation of the health utilities index mark 3 and the short form 6D: evidence from an individual participant data meta-analysis of very preterm and very low birthweight adults
- PMID: 36705795
- PMCID: PMC10172285
- DOI: 10.1007/s11136-023-03344-x
Comparative evaluation of the health utilities index mark 3 and the short form 6D: evidence from an individual participant data meta-analysis of very preterm and very low birthweight adults
Abstract
Background: The most appropriate preference-based health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instruments for trials or research studies that ascertain the consequences of individuals born very preterm and/or low birthweight (VP/VLBW) are not known. Agreement between the HUI3 and SF-6D multi-attribute utility measures have not been previously investigated for VP/VLBW and normal birthweight or term-born controls. This study examined the agreement between the outputs of the HUI3 and SF-6D measures among adults born VP/VLBW and normal birthweight or term born controls.
Methods: We used two prospective cohorts of individuals born VP/VLBW and controls contributing to the 'Research on European Children and Adults Born Preterm' (RECAP) consortium which assessed HRQoL using two preference-based measures. The combined dataset of individual participant data (IPD) included 407 adult VP/VLBW survivors and 367 controls, ranging in age from 18 to 26 years. Bland-Altman plots, intra-class correlation coefficients, and generalized linear mixed models in a one-step approach were used to examine agreement between the measures.
Results: There was significant discordance between the HUI3 and SF-6D multi-attribute utility measures in the VP/VLBW sample, controls, and in the combined samples. Agreement between the HUI3 and SF-6D multi-attribute utility measures was weaker in controls compared with VP/VLBW individuals.
Conclusions and relevance: The HUI3 and SF-6D each provide unique information on different aspects of health status across the groups. The HUI3 better captures preterm-related changes to HRQoL in adulthood compared to SF-6D. Studies focused on measuring physical or cognitive aspects of health will likely benefit from using the HUI3 instead of the SF-6D, regardless of gestational age at birth and birthweight status.
Keywords: HRQoL; HUI3; Health utilities; SF-6D; Very low birth weight; Very preterm birth.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Health-Related Quality-of-Life Outcomes of Very Preterm or Very Low Birth Weight Adults: Evidence From an Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis.Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 Jan;41(1):93-105. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01201-2. Epub 2022 Oct 26. Pharmacoeconomics. 2023. PMID: 36287335 Free PMC article.
-
A heterogeneity analysis of health-related quality of life in early adults born very preterm or very low birthweight across the sociodemographic spectrum.Soc Sci Med. 2025 Sep;380:118181. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118181. Epub 2025 May 10. Soc Sci Med. 2025. PMID: 40411960
-
Self and parent perspectives on health-related quality of life of adolescents born very preterm.J Pediatr. 2013 Oct;163(4):1020-6.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.04.030. Epub 2013 May 30. J Pediatr. 2013. PMID: 23726545
-
Association of Very Preterm Birth or Very Low Birth Weight With Intelligence in Adulthood: An Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis.JAMA Pediatr. 2021 Aug 1;175(8):e211058. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.1058. Epub 2021 Aug 2. JAMA Pediatr. 2021. PMID: 34047752 Free PMC article.
-
Mental health outcomes of adults born very preterm or with very low birth weight: A systematic review.Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Jun;25(3):101113. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2020.101113. Epub 2020 Apr 28. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020. PMID: 32402835
Cited by
-
Tracking visual outcomes - Follow-up on patients born preterm with childhood-onset visual impairment.Acta Ophthalmol. 2025 Sep;103(6):634-644. doi: 10.1111/aos.17461. Epub 2025 Feb 15. Acta Ophthalmol. 2025. PMID: 39953808 Free PMC article.
-
Psychometric Performance of Generic Childhood Multi-Attribute Utility Instruments in Preterm and Low Birthweight Populations: A Systematic Review.Children (Basel). 2023 Nov 10;10(11):1798. doi: 10.3390/children10111798. Children (Basel). 2023. PMID: 38002889 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Editorial: How best to deliver disability care in a cost-effective way: improving health care delivery and health outcomes for people with disability.Front Rehabil Sci. 2023 Oct 30;4:1307810. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1307810. eCollection 2023. Front Rehabil Sci. 2023. PMID: 38028157 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Drummond Michael F, Sculpher Mark J, Karl Claxton, Stoddart Greg L, Torrance George W. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford University Press; 2015.
-
- Drugs Canadian Agency, Health Technologies, others. (2006). Guidelines for the economic evaluation of health technologies: Canada.
-
- Excellence Care. Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal, Retrieved April 4, 2013, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK395867/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK395867.pdf - PubMed
-
- Stenman U, Hakama M, Knekt P, et al. Measurement and modeling of health-related quality of life. Epidemiology Demography Public Health. 2010;195:130–135.
-
- Human Services Australia. Dept., Health. (1995). Guidelines for the Pharmaceutical Industry on Preparation of Submissions to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee: Including Major Submissions Involving Economic Analyses, November 1995. Australian Government Pub. Service.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources