Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 Jun;32(6):1703-1716.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03344-x. Epub 2023 Jan 27.

Comparative evaluation of the health utilities index mark 3 and the short form 6D: evidence from an individual participant data meta-analysis of very preterm and very low birthweight adults

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Comparative evaluation of the health utilities index mark 3 and the short form 6D: evidence from an individual participant data meta-analysis of very preterm and very low birthweight adults

Corneliu Bolbocean et al. Qual Life Res. 2023 Jun.

Abstract

Background: The most appropriate preference-based health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instruments for trials or research studies that ascertain the consequences of individuals born very preterm and/or low birthweight (VP/VLBW) are not known. Agreement between the HUI3 and SF-6D multi-attribute utility measures have not been previously investigated for VP/VLBW and normal birthweight or term-born controls. This study examined the agreement between the outputs of the HUI3 and SF-6D measures among adults born VP/VLBW and normal birthweight or term born controls.

Methods: We used two prospective cohorts of individuals born VP/VLBW and controls contributing to the 'Research on European Children and Adults Born Preterm' (RECAP) consortium which assessed HRQoL using two preference-based measures. The combined dataset of individual participant data (IPD) included 407 adult VP/VLBW survivors and 367 controls, ranging in age from 18 to 26 years. Bland-Altman plots, intra-class correlation coefficients, and generalized linear mixed models in a one-step approach were used to examine agreement between the measures.

Results: There was significant discordance between the HUI3 and SF-6D multi-attribute utility measures in the VP/VLBW sample, controls, and in the combined samples. Agreement between the HUI3 and SF-6D multi-attribute utility measures was weaker in controls compared with VP/VLBW individuals.

Conclusions and relevance: The HUI3 and SF-6D each provide unique information on different aspects of health status across the groups. The HUI3 better captures preterm-related changes to HRQoL in adulthood compared to SF-6D. Studies focused on measuring physical or cognitive aspects of health will likely benefit from using the HUI3 instead of the SF-6D, regardless of gestational age at birth and birthweight status.

Keywords: HRQoL; HUI3; Health utilities; SF-6D; Very low birth weight; Very preterm birth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The Bland–Altman plots by VP/VLBW status
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The Bland–Altman plots for VP/VLBW and controls combined

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Drummond Michael F, Sculpher Mark J, Karl Claxton, Stoddart Greg L, Torrance George W. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford University Press; 2015.
    1. Drugs Canadian Agency, Health Technologies, others. (2006). Guidelines for the economic evaluation of health technologies: Canada.
    1. Excellence Care. Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal, Retrieved April 4, 2013, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK395867/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK395867.pdf - PubMed
    1. Stenman U, Hakama M, Knekt P, et al. Measurement and modeling of health-related quality of life. Epidemiology Demography Public Health. 2010;195:130–135.
    1. Human Services Australia. Dept., Health. (1995). Guidelines for the Pharmaceutical Industry on Preparation of Submissions to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee: Including Major Submissions Involving Economic Analyses, November 1995. Australian Government Pub. Service.

Publication types

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources