Patients at the Heart of the Scientific Dialogue: An Industry Perspective
- PMID: 36705813
- PMCID: PMC9881512
- DOI: 10.1007/s40487-023-00220-z
Patients at the Heart of the Scientific Dialogue: An Industry Perspective
Erratum in
-
Correction: Patients at the Heart of the Scientific Dialogue: An Industry Perspective.Oncol Ther. 2023 Mar;11(1):25. doi: 10.1007/s40487-023-00222-x. Oncol Ther. 2023. PMID: 36749419 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Keywords: Health literacy; Open access; Patient centricity; Plain language summary.
Plain language summary
Pharmaceutical companies need to regularly communicate to patients all essential information about their medicines, especially data from the research studies that were conducted to evaluate the medicine’s benefits and risks. To do that, companies will need to make sure patients have access to and awareness of relevant information. This can be achieved by ensuring medical information is freely available to the reader, and working with publishers to facilitate open access (free) publications. Companies should also help improve patients’ understanding of medical terminology, offer simplified versions of scientific content, and deliver information through various formats (print versus digital, text versus audio versus video) to address different learning styles and literacy levels. This will empower patients with knowledge and improve shared decision-making. It will also be essential for pharmaceutical companies to involve patients in various stages of medicine development, such as getting their input on how the research studies for investigating these medicines are designed and reported to ensure relevant information to patients are well-captured and clear. This should also go in parallel with providing opportunities to elevate the patient voice through patient-partnered research and authorship on topics particularly relevant to them.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Open Pharma recommendations for plain language summaries of peer-reviewed medical journal publications.Curr Med Res Opin. 2021 Nov;37(11):2015-2016. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1971185. Epub 2021 Sep 12. Curr Med Res Opin. 2021. Update in: Curr Med Res Opin. 2022 Jun;38(6):881-882. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2072570. PMID: 34511020 Updated.
-
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012. PMID: 27820528
-
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015. PMID: 26571285
-
Improving patient informed consent for haemophilia gene therapy: the case for change.Ther Adv Rare Dis. 2021 Sep 26;2:26330040211047244. doi: 10.1177/26330040211047244. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec. Ther Adv Rare Dis. 2021. PMID: 37181114 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Current challenges and opportunities for pharmacogenomics: perspective of the Industry Pharmacogenomics Working Group (I-PWG).Hum Genet. 2022 Jun;141(6):1165-1173. doi: 10.1007/s00439-021-02282-3. Epub 2021 Jun 3. Hum Genet. 2022. PMID: 34081195 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Diversity in Oncology Clinical Trials: Current Landscape for Industry-Sponsored Clinical Trials in Asia.Oncol Ther. 2024 Mar;12(1):115-129. doi: 10.1007/s40487-023-00254-3. Epub 2023 Dec 8. Oncol Ther. 2024. PMID: 38064162 Free PMC article.
-
Seven Actions Towards Advancing Patient Authorship and Collaboration in Peer-Reviewed Publications.Patient. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1007/s40271-025-00750-w. Online ahead of print. Patient. 2025. PMID: 40603810 Review.
-
Practices and Barriers in Developing and Disseminating Plain-Language Resources Reporting Medical Research Information: A Scoping Review.Patient. 2024 Sep;17(5):493-518. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00700-y. Epub 2024 Jun 15. Patient. 2024. PMID: 38878237 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Furlong P, Bridges JF, Charnas L, Fallon JR, Fischer R, Flanigan KM, et al. How a patient advocacy group developed the first proposed draft guidance document for industry for submission to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2015;10:82. doi: 10.1186/s13023-015-0281-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources