Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 27:7:e41422.
doi: 10.2196/41422.

ReachCare Mobile Apps for Patients Experiencing Suicidality in the Emergency Department: Development and Usability Testing Using Mixed Methods

Affiliations

ReachCare Mobile Apps for Patients Experiencing Suicidality in the Emergency Department: Development and Usability Testing Using Mixed Methods

Celine Larkin et al. JMIR Form Res. .

Abstract

Background: Many individuals with suicide risk present to acute care settings such as emergency departments (EDs). However, staffing and time constraints mean that many EDs are not well equipped to deliver evidence-based interventions for patients experiencing suicidality. An existing intervention initiated in the ED for patients with suicide risk (Emergency Department Safety Assessment and Follow-up Evaluation [ED-SAFE]) has been found to be effective but faces trenchant barriers for widespread adoption.

Objective: On the basis of the ED-SAFE intervention, we aimed to develop 2 apps for patients with suicide risk: a web app guiding patients through safety planning in the ED (ED app) and a smartphone app providing patients components of the ED-SAFE program on their phones after discharge (patient app). We then tested the usability of these apps with patients presenting to the ED with suicide risk.

Methods: Using a user-centered design framework, we first developed user personas to explore the needs and characteristics of patients who are at risk for suicide using inputs from clinicians (n=3) and suicidologists (n=4). Next, we validated these personas during interviews with individuals with lived experience of suicidality (n=6) and used them to inform our application designs. We field-tested the apps with ED patients presenting with suicide risk (n=14) in 2 iterative cycles to assess their usability and engagement using a mixed methods approach. We also rated the quality and fidelity of the safety plans created.

Results: We developed 2 interoperable and complementary apps. The first is a web app designed for use on a tablet device during ED admission that guides the patient by creating a safety plan using a chatbot-style interface. The second is a smartphone app for use after discharge and allows the patient to view, edit, and share their completed safety plan; access self-care education, helplines, and behavioral health referrals; and track follow-up appointments with the study clinician. The initial prototype usability testing (n=9) demonstrated satisfactory scores (ED app System Usability Scale [SUS], mean 78.6/100, SD 24.1; User Engagement Scale, mean 3.74/5, SD 0.72; patient app SUS, mean 81.7/100, SD 20.1). After refining the apps based on participant feedback, the second cycle testing (n=5) showed improvement (ED app SUS, mean 90.5/100, SD 9.9; User Engagement Scale, mean 4.07/5, SD 0.36; patient app SUS, mean 97.0/100, SD 1.9). The quality ratings for completed safety plans were satisfactory (Safety Planning Intervention Scoring Algorithm-Brief, mean 27.4, SD 3.4).

Conclusions: By adopting a user-centered approach and creating personas to guide development, we were able to create apps for ED patients with suicide risk and obtain satisfactory usability, engagement, and quality scores. Developing digital health tools based on user-centered design principles that deliver evidence-based intervention components may help overcome trenchant implementation barriers in challenging health care settings.

Keywords: emergency department; engagement; mobile app; mobile phone; suicide; usability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Persona development material: (A) attribute spectrums and (B) worksheet.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A snapshot of the categorization process: (A) cluster analysis resulting in 5 clusters for the 14 participants (N2, C2, P2, etc), and (B) spectrum map for the 5 identified clusters.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Design mock-ups for the patient and ED apps for iteration 2. ED: emergency department; TASCS: Technology-Assisted Systems Change for Suicide prevention.
Figure 4
Figure 4
ED and patient apps used in iteration 3. ED: emergency department.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Heron M. Deaths: leading causes for 2019. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2021 Jul;70(9):1–114. doi: 10.15620/cdc:104186. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr70/nvsr70-09-508.pdf - DOI - PubMed
    1. Murphy SL, Xu J, Kochanek KD, Arias E. Mortality in the United States, 2017. NCHS Data Brief. 2018 Nov;(328):1–8. doi: 10.3886/icpsr07632. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db328-h.pdf - DOI - PubMed
    1. Owens PL, McDermott KW, Lipari RN, Hambrick MM. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs. Rockville, MD, USA: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2020. Emergency Department Visits Related to Suicidal Ideation or Suicide Attempt, 2008–2017. - PubMed
    1. Ahmedani BK, Simon GE, Stewart C, Beck A, Waitzfelder BE, Rossom R, Lynch F, Owen-Smith A, Hunkeler EM, Whiteside U, Operskalski BH, Coffey MJ, Solberg LI. Health care contacts in the year before suicide death. J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jun;29(6):870–7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2767-3. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/24567199 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Claassen CA, Larkin GL. Occult suicidality in an emergency department population. Br J Psychiatry. 2005 Apr;186:352–3. doi: 10.1192/bjp.186.4.352.S0007125000165894 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources