Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan-Feb;12(1):58-79.
doi: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000590. Epub 2023 Jan 11.

Latest Development in Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses: An Update

Affiliations
Free article

Latest Development in Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses: An Update

Elinor Megiddo-Barnir et al. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2023 Jan-Feb.
Free article

Abstract

In recent years, there has been an overwhelming influx of different types of intraocular lenses (IOLs) as treatment for presbyopia. The extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) technology creates a single elongated focal point to enhance depth of focus, in contrast to the multiple foci of multifocal (MF) lenses. In this way, the EDOF lenses aim to reduce photic phenomena, glare, and halos, which have been reported in MF IOLs. A potential disadvantage of this is a blur due to decreased retinal image quality when the amount of the aberrations is increased excessively. Multifocality and EDOF characteristics are not exclusive of each other. Frequently, EDOF IOLs are combined with MF optical designs, a bifocal IOL may exhibit EDOF characteristics, likewise an aspheric monofocal IOL or a diffractive or refractive trifocal IOL. Thus, EDOF lenses are commonly subjected to confusion. A wide range of different types of EDOF lenses are available on the market to surgeons. In this practical update, we aim to clarify what is a true EDOF lens, classify the different types of the EDOF lenses based on their optical principle and review their recently reported outcomes. Comprehensive patient examination and selection, combined with knowledge of the most updated options and adequate patient counseling, can avoid dissatisfaction and yield the desired outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to declare.

References

    1. Maurino V, Allan BD, Rubin GS, et al. Quality of vision after bilateral multifocal intraocular lens implantation; a randomized trial—AT LISA 809M versus AcrySof ReSTOR SN6AD1. Ophthalmology. 2015;122:700–710.
    1. Monaco G, Gari M, Di Censo F, et al. Visual performance after bilateral implantation of 2 new presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses: trifocal versus extended range of vision. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43:737–747.
    1. Alio JL, Plaza-Puche AB, Férnandez-Buenaga R, et al. Multifocal intraocular lenses: an overview. Surv Ophthalmol. 2017;62:611–634.
    1. Rampat R, Gatinel D. Multifocal and extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses in 2020. Ophthalmology. 2021;128:e164–e185.
    1. Goldberg DG, Goldberg MH, Shah R, et al. Pseudophakic mini-monovision: high patient satisfaction, reduced spectacle dependence, and low cost. BMC Ophthalmol. 2018;18:293.