Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan:9:e2200348.
doi: 10.1200/GO.22.00348.

National Cancer Grid Virtual Tumor Boards of Head and Neck Cancers: An Innovative Approach to Multidisciplinary Care

Affiliations

National Cancer Grid Virtual Tumor Boards of Head and Neck Cancers: An Innovative Approach to Multidisciplinary Care

Shivakumar Thiagarajan et al. JCO Glob Oncol. 2023 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: Virtual tumor board (VTB) via videoconference facility involving multiple specialists in the decision making for various tumors is well accepted, especially in high-income countries. Information on virtual tumor boards for head and neck cancers especially from low- and middle-income countries is sparse. In this study, we have audited the findings of the National Cancer Grid VTBs performed for head and neck cancers.

Methods: All patients discussed in the head and neck VTBs at our center between December 2016 and February 2022 were included in the study. Details such as the type of institute sending patients for discussion, its location, subsites within the head and neck region, histopathology, treatment setting or question for the VTB, and availability of guidelines for such patient scenarios were assessed. Also, a survey was sent to assess the usefulness of the VTBs.

Results: A total of 208 patients were discussed in 54 VTB sessions. The most common head and neck sites discussed in the VTBs were the oral cavity (n = 64, 30.7%) followed by skull base/nose and paranasal sinuses/eyelid-orbit tumors (n = 49, 23.5%). Nonsquamous cell carcinoma was the most common histopathology discussed; recurrent cancers/residual diseases were the most common treatment settings (n = 134, 64.4%) for which there were no existing guidelines. Survey results showed that most VTB decisions were implementable, and respondents felt that VTBs were a useful educational tool as well.

Conclusion: Our study affirms the feasibility of VTBs in low- and middle-income countries' health care systems for managing uncommon malignancies and clinical situations, which act as an important educational platform.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated unless otherwise noted. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or ascopubs.org/go/authors/author-center.

Open Payments is a public database containing information reported by companies about payments made to US-licensed physicians (Open Payments).

C.S. Pramesh

This author is a member of the JCO Global Oncology Editorial Board. Journal policy recused the author from having any role in the peer review of this manuscript.

Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Aurobindo

No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Health in Wales | Document | Calman Hine Report. http://www.wales.nhs.uk/document/112166/info/
    1. Patil RD, Meinzen-Derr JK, Hendricks BL, et al. : Improving access and timeliness of care for veterans with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A multidisciplinary team’s approach. Laryngoscope 126:627-631, 2016 - PubMed
    1. Newman EA, Guest AB, Helvie MA, et al. : Changes in surgical management resulting from case review at a breast cancer multidisciplinary tumor board. Cancer 107:2346-2351, 2006 - PubMed
    1. Licitra L, Keilholz U, Tahara M, et al. : Evaluation of the benefit and use of multidisciplinary teams in the treatment of head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol 59:73-79, 2016 - PubMed
    1. 2020 Standards and Resources. https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/cancer/coc/standards/2020