National Cancer Grid Virtual Tumor Boards of Head and Neck Cancers: An Innovative Approach to Multidisciplinary Care
- PMID: 36706349
- PMCID: PMC10166436
- DOI: 10.1200/GO.22.00348
National Cancer Grid Virtual Tumor Boards of Head and Neck Cancers: An Innovative Approach to Multidisciplinary Care
Abstract
Purpose: Virtual tumor board (VTB) via videoconference facility involving multiple specialists in the decision making for various tumors is well accepted, especially in high-income countries. Information on virtual tumor boards for head and neck cancers especially from low- and middle-income countries is sparse. In this study, we have audited the findings of the National Cancer Grid VTBs performed for head and neck cancers.
Methods: All patients discussed in the head and neck VTBs at our center between December 2016 and February 2022 were included in the study. Details such as the type of institute sending patients for discussion, its location, subsites within the head and neck region, histopathology, treatment setting or question for the VTB, and availability of guidelines for such patient scenarios were assessed. Also, a survey was sent to assess the usefulness of the VTBs.
Results: A total of 208 patients were discussed in 54 VTB sessions. The most common head and neck sites discussed in the VTBs were the oral cavity (n = 64, 30.7%) followed by skull base/nose and paranasal sinuses/eyelid-orbit tumors (n = 49, 23.5%). Nonsquamous cell carcinoma was the most common histopathology discussed; recurrent cancers/residual diseases were the most common treatment settings (n = 134, 64.4%) for which there were no existing guidelines. Survey results showed that most VTB decisions were implementable, and respondents felt that VTBs were a useful educational tool as well.
Conclusion: Our study affirms the feasibility of VTBs in low- and middle-income countries' health care systems for managing uncommon malignancies and clinical situations, which act as an important educational platform.
Conflict of interest statement
The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated unless otherwise noted. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to
Open Payments is a public database containing information reported by companies about payments made to US-licensed physicians (
This author is a member of the
No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.
Similar articles
-
The Emergence of Virtual Tumor Boards in Neuro-Oncology: Opportunities and Challenges.Cureus. 2022 Jun 6;14(6):e25682. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25682. eCollection 2022 Jun. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 35677741 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing the feasibility of a virtual tumor board program: a case study.J Healthc Manag. 2014 May-Jun;59(3):177-93. J Healthc Manag. 2014. PMID: 24988672 Free PMC article.
-
Establishment of a Regional Virtual Tumor Board Program to Improve the Process of Care for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.J Oncol Pract. 2015 Jan;11(1):e66-74. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.000679. Epub 2014 Dec 2. J Oncol Pract. 2015. PMID: 25466708 Free PMC article.
-
INGN 201: Ad-p53, Ad5CMV-p53, adenoviral p53, p53 gene therapy--introgen, RPR/INGN 201.Drugs R D. 2007;8(3):176-87. doi: 10.2165/00126839-200708030-00005. Drugs R D. 2007. PMID: 17472413 Review.
-
Barriers in Access to Care for Patients With Head and Neck Cancer in Resource-Limited Settings: A Systematic Review.JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Mar 1;146(3):291-297. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.4311. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020. PMID: 31944228
Cited by
-
Cancer Multidisciplinary Teams in Africa: A Narrative Review of Their Role and Availability.Cureus. 2025 May 21;17(5):e84553. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84553. eCollection 2025 May. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40546475 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The case for centralization of care in penile cancer - respecting geographical needs.Nat Rev Urol. 2024 Aug;21(8):453-454. doi: 10.1038/s41585-024-00879-7. Nat Rev Urol. 2024. PMID: 38622327 No abstract available.
-
Multidisciplinary tumor board for head and neck cancer from the perspective of medical oncologists-optimizing its effectiveness.Front Oncol. 2023 Aug 30;13:1257853. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1257853. eCollection 2023. Front Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37711197 Free PMC article. Review.
-
How well does the virtual format of oncology multidisciplinary team meetings work? An assessment of participants' perspectives and limitations: A scoping review.PLoS One. 2023 Nov 16;18(11):e0294635. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294635. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37972143 Free PMC article.
-
Growing the global cancer care system: success stories from around the world and lessons for the future.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024 Aug 1;116(8):1193-1197. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae087. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024. PMID: 38663853 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Health in Wales | Document | Calman Hine Report. http://www.wales.nhs.uk/document/112166/info/
-
- Patil RD, Meinzen-Derr JK, Hendricks BL, et al. : Improving access and timeliness of care for veterans with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A multidisciplinary team’s approach. Laryngoscope 126:627-631, 2016 - PubMed
-
- Newman EA, Guest AB, Helvie MA, et al. : Changes in surgical management resulting from case review at a breast cancer multidisciplinary tumor board. Cancer 107:2346-2351, 2006 - PubMed
-
- Licitra L, Keilholz U, Tahara M, et al. : Evaluation of the benefit and use of multidisciplinary teams in the treatment of head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol 59:73-79, 2016 - PubMed
-
- 2020 Standards and Resources. https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/cancer/coc/standards/2020
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical