Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 Jan 27;23(1):77.
doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04554-w.

Cognitive rehabilitation for improving cognitive functions and reducing the severity of depressive symptoms in adult patients with Major Depressive Disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Cognitive rehabilitation for improving cognitive functions and reducing the severity of depressive symptoms in adult patients with Major Depressive Disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials

Saba Mokhtari et al. BMC Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Introduction: Nearly 40% of patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) have been found to experience cognitive impairment in at least one domain. Cognitive impairment associated with MDD is disproportionately represented in patients that have not fully returned to psychosocial functioning. As awareness regarding cognitive dysfunction in MDD patients grows, so does the interest in developing newer treatments that specifically address these deficits.

Method: In the present study, we conduct a systematic review of controlled randomized clinical trials that used cognitive training and remediation interventions for improving cognitive functions and reducing symptom severity in adult patients with MDD. We selected studies published before March 2022 using search databases including PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Google scholar. For conducting the meta-analysis, standard differences in means with the random effect model and with a 95% confidence interval of change in outcome measures from baseline to post-intervention between the cognitive rehabilitation and the control groups were calculated.

Results: The database search resulted in identifying 756 studies of interest, which ultimately 15 studies with 410 participants in the cognitive rehabilitation group and 339 participants in the control group were included. The meta-analysis of the data extracted from these studies, shows a moderate and significant effect on the executive function (d = 0.59 (95% CI, 0.25 to 0.93) p-value = 0.001, I2 = 15.2%), verbal learning (d = 0.45 (95% CI, 0.12 to 0.78) p-value = 0.007, I2 = 0.00%), and working memory (d = 0.41 (95% CI, 0.18 to 0.64) p-value < 0.001, I2 = 33%) of MDD patients. Although, there were no significant difference between intervention and control group in attention (d = 0.32 (95% CI, -0.01 to 0.66) p-value = 0.058, I2 = 0.00%) or depressive symptoms.

Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that cognitive rehabilitation is an effective intervention for the executive function, verbal learning, and working memory of MDD patients. Due to the importance of these neuropsychological deficits in day-to-day life and the core symptoms of MDD, cognitive rehabilitation should be considered an important part of treating MDD. Further research in this area and concentrated on these particular deficits is warranted.

Keywords: Cognitive Function; Executive function; Major Depressive Disorder; Meta-Analysis; Systematic Review; Verbal learning; Working memory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The details of the question and the key-words
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The flowchart of studies
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The forest plot of analyses of MDD symptoms’ severity
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The forest plot of analyses of the attention
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
The funnel plot of analyses of the attention
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
The forest plot of analyses of the attention after sensitivity analysis
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
The forest plot of analyses of the executive function
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
The forest plot of analyses of the verbal learning
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
The funnel plot of analyses of the verbal learning
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
The forest plot of analyses of the verbal learning after sensitivity analysis
Fig. 11
Fig. 11
The forest plot of analyses of the working memory
Fig. 12
Fig. 12
The assessment of the main biases of the studies

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Araminia B, Shalbafan M, Mortezaei A, Shirazi E, Ghaffari S, Sahebolzamani E, et al. L-Carnosine combination therapy for major depressive disorder: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Affect Disord. 2020;267:131–136. - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Arlington: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
    1. Ghazizadeh-Hashemi M, Ghajar A, Shalbafan M-R, Ghazizadeh-Hashemi F, Afarideh M, Malekpour F, et al. Palmitoylethanolamide as adjunctive therapy in major depressive disorder: A double-blind, randomized and placebo-controlled trial. J Affect Disord. 2018;232:127–133. - PubMed
    1. Lim GY, Tam WW, Lu Y, Ho CS, Zhang MW, Ho RC. Prevalence of depression in the community from 30 countries between 1994 and 2014. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1–10. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chiriţă AL, Gheorman V, Bondari D, Rogoveanu I. Current understanding of the neurobiology of major depressive disorder. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2015;56(2 Suppl):651–658. - PubMed

Publication types