Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2023 Sep;58(3):864-876.
doi: 10.1002/jmri.28618. Epub 2023 Jan 28.

A Multicenter Longitudinal MRI Study Assessing LeMan-PV Software Accuracy in the Detection of White Matter Lesions in Multiple Sclerosis Patients

Affiliations
Free article
Multicenter Study

A Multicenter Longitudinal MRI Study Assessing LeMan-PV Software Accuracy in the Detection of White Matter Lesions in Multiple Sclerosis Patients

Alexandra Ramona Todea et al. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2023 Sep.
Free article

Abstract

Background: Detecting new and enlarged lesions in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients is needed to determine their disease activity. LeMan-PV is a software embedded in the scanner reconstruction system of one vendor, which automatically assesses new and enlarged white matter lesions (NELs) in the follow-up of MS patients; however, multicenter validation studies are lacking.

Purpose: To assess the accuracy of LeMan-PV for the longitudinal detection NEL white-matter MS lesions in a multicenter clinical setting.

Study type: Retrospective, longitudinal.

Subjects: A total of 206 patients with a definitive MS diagnosis and at least two follow-up MRI studies from five centers participating in the Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Cohort study. Mean age at first follow-up = 45.2 years (range: 36.9-52.8 years); 70 males.

Field strength/sequence: Fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and T1-weighted magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo (T1-MPRAGE) sequences at 1.5 T and 3 T.

Assessment: The study included 313 MRI pairs of datasets. Data were analyzed with LeMan-PV and compared with a manual "reference standard" provided by a neuroradiologist. A second rater (neurologist) performed the same analysis in a subset of MRI pairs to evaluate the rating-accuracy. The Sensitivity (Se), Specificity (Sp), Accuracy (Acc), F1-score, lesion-wise False-Positive-Rate (aFPR), and other measures were used to assess LeMan-PV performance for the detection of NEL at 1.5 T and 3 T. The performance was also evaluated in the subgroup of 123 MRI pairs at 3 T.

Statistical tests: Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cohen's kappa (CK) were used to evaluate the agreement between readers.

Results: The interreader agreement was high for detecting new lesions (ICC = 0.97, Pvalue < 10-20 , CK = 0.82, P value = 0) and good (ICC = 0.75, P value < 10-12 , CK = 0.68, P value = 0) for detecting enlarged lesions. Across all centers, scanner field strengths (1.5 T, 3 T), and for NEL, LeMan-PV achieved: Acc = 61%, Se = 65%, Sp = 60%, F1-score = 0.44, aFPR = 1.31. When both follow-ups were acquired at 3 T, LeMan-PV accuracy was higher (Acc = 66%, Se = 66%, Sp = 66%, F1-score = 0.28, aFPR = 3.03).

Data conclusion: In this multicenter study using clinical data settings acquired at 1.5 T and 3 T, and variations in MRI protocols, LeMan-PV showed similar sensitivity in detecting NEL with respect to other recent 3 T multicentric studies based on neural networks. While LeMan-PV performance is not optimal, its main advantage is that it provides automated clinical decision support integrated into the radiological-routine flow.

Evidence level: 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Keywords: lesion activity; lesion segmentation; longitudinal analysis; longitudinal lesion segmentation; multiple sclerosis; white matter lesions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

REFERENCES

    1. Lassmann H, Brück W, Lucchinetti CF. The immunopathology of multiple sclerosis: An overview. Brain Pathol 2007;17:210-218.
    1. Thompson AJ, Banwell BL, Barkhof F, et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol 2018;17:162-173.
    1. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol 2011;69:292-302.
    1. Lassmann H. Targets of therapy in progressive MS. Mult Scler 2017;23:1593-1599.
    1. Río J, Castilló J, Rovira A, et al. Measures in the first year of therapy predict the response to interferon beta in MS. Mult Scler 2009;15:848-853.

Publication types