Pharmacokinetic comparability between two populations using nonlinear mixed effect models: a Monte Carlo study
- PMID: 36708443
- DOI: 10.1007/s10928-023-09842-2
Pharmacokinetic comparability between two populations using nonlinear mixed effect models: a Monte Carlo study
Abstract
'Are two populations the same or are they different' is a question that is often faced in clinical pharmacology trials e.g., a pharmacokinetic trial studying a particular drug in racially different groups. To address this question, concentration-time data were simulated from a reference and test population, where in the latter the clearance, sample size, and sampling design were systematically varied. It was of interest to determine whether the estimates of clearance from the two groups were the same or different. Two approaches were used to estimate the empirical Bayes estimates (EBEs) for clearance. One approach developed a population pharmacokinetic model for the reference population and the EBEs for the reference population were estimated from this model. The parameters of the reference population were fixed to their maximum likelihood estimates. The model was then applied to the test population dataset to estimate the EBEs of the test population using the MAXEVAL = 0 option in NONMEM. A second approach, the theta approach, combined the reference and test datasets into a single dataset and used population as a covariate in the model; the EBEs were estimated from this combined model. The power and type I error rate of each approach were calculated for each treatment combination using a variety of statistical tests to determine whether there was a difference in the distribution of the EBEs in the reference population compared to the test population. Our results suggest that either MAXEVAL or theta approaches can be used with informative sampling designs. In addition to reasonable power and type I error, both approaches gave almost identical results under a dense sampling design. To statistically compare the distribution of EBEs of pharmacokinetic parameters from a reference group to that of a test group, a T-test and DTS eCDF test are equally useful.
Keywords: Bayesian estimation; Kolmogorov–Smirnov; NONMEM; Nonlinear mixed effect models.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.Clin Pharmacokinet. 2006;45(4):365-83. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200645040-00003. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2006. PMID: 16584284
-
Further Evaluation of Covariate Analysis using Empirical Bayes Estimates in Population Pharmacokinetics: the Perception of Shrinkage and Likelihood Ratio Test.AAPS J. 2017 Jan;19(1):264-273. doi: 10.1208/s12248-016-0001-4. Epub 2016 Oct 19. AAPS J. 2017. PMID: 27761720
-
Covariate detection in population pharmacokinetics using partially linear mixed effects models.Pharm Res. 2005 Apr;22(4):541-9. doi: 10.1007/s11095-005-2492-z. Epub 2005 Apr 7. Pharm Res. 2005. PMID: 15846461
-
Shrinkage in nonlinear mixed-effects population models: quantification, influencing factors, and impact.AAPS J. 2012 Dec;14(4):927-36. doi: 10.1208/s12248-012-9407-9. Epub 2012 Sep 20. AAPS J. 2012. PMID: 22993107 Free PMC article.
-
Prior information for population pharmacokinetic and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis: overview and guidance with a focus on the NONMEM PRIOR subroutine.J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2020 Oct;47(5):431-446. doi: 10.1007/s10928-020-09695-z. Epub 2020 Jun 13. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2020. PMID: 32535847 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A Cross-sectional Comparative Analysis of Eleven Population Pharmacokinetic Models for Docetaxel in Chinese Breast Cancer Patients.Curr Drug Metab. 2024;25(7):479-488. doi: 10.2174/0113892002322494240816032948. Curr Drug Metab. 2024. PMID: 39161139 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Center For Drug Evaluation and Research Application Number: 209819Orig1s000 Clinical Pharmacology and Biopharmaceutics Review(S) [Sublocade®]. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2017/209819Orig1s000C... Accessed 23 July 2022
-
- Lanke S, Shoaf SE (2019) Population pharmacokinetic analyses and model validation of tolvaptan in subjects with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. J Clin Pharmacol 59(5):763–770. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.1370 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Ralph LD, Sandstrom M, Twelves C, Dobbs NA, Thomson AH (2006) Assessment of the validity of a population pharmacokinetic model for epirubicin. Br J Clin Pharmacol 62(1):47–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2006.02584.x - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Comets E, Ikeda K, Hoff P, Fumoleau P, Wanders J, Tanigawara Y (2003) Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of S-1, an oral anticancer agent, in Western and Japanese patients. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 30(4):257–283. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026142601822 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Reporting and Analysis Plan (RAP) for Dose Escalation and Target Engagement Interims (GSK2330811). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/25/NCT03041025/SAP_001.pdf Accessed 23 July 2022
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources