Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Mar;10(3):e225-e234.
doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(22)00353-2. Epub 2023 Jan 25.

Expecting more: the case for incorporating fertility services into comprehensive sickle cell disease care

Affiliations
Review

Expecting more: the case for incorporating fertility services into comprehensive sickle cell disease care

Lydia H Pecker et al. Lancet Haematol. 2023 Mar.

Abstract

Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) are not yet systematically available to people with sickle cell disease or their parents. Fertility care for these groups requires addressing sickle cell disease-associated infertility risks, fertility preservation options, pregnancy possibilities and outcomes, and, when needed, infertility treatment. People with a chance of having a child with sickle cell disease can use in-vitro fertilisation with preimplantation genetic testing to conceive a child unaffected by sickle cell disease. Also, parents of children with sickle cell disease can use this technology to identify embryos to become potential future matched sibling donors for stem cell transplant. In the USA, disparities in fertility care for the sickle cell disease community are especially stark. Universal screening of newborn babies' identifies sickle cell disease and sickle cell trait, guidelines direct preconception genetic carrier screening, and standard-of-care fertility preserving options exist. However, potentially transformative treatments and cures for patients with sickle cell disease are not used due to iatrogenic infertility concerns. In diversely resourced care settings, obstacles to providing fertility care to people affected by sickle cell disease persist. In this Viewpoint, we contend that fertility care should be incorporated into the comprehensive care model for sickle cell disease, supporting alignment of treatment goals with reproductive life plans and delivering on the promise of individualised high-quality care for people with sickle cell disease and their families. We consider the obligation to provide fertility care in light of medical evidence, with acknowledgment of formidable obstacles to optimising care, and powerful historical and ethical considerations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests LHP declares grant funding from National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute K23HL146841 and U01 HL156620-01, the American Society of Hematology, Doris Duke Charitable Foundation Grant number 2020147, and the Mellon Foundation; consulting fees from Global Blood Therapeutics and Novo Nordisk; support for meeting attendance from the American Society of Hematology and the Hemostasis and Thrombosis Research Society; serves on the CRESCENT data safety monitoring board and is an advisor to the Sickle Cell Reproductive Health Education Directive; and serves in a leadership role at the Foundation for Women and Girls with Blood Disorders' Sickle Cell Disease Learning Action Network and on the American Society of Hematology's Maternal Health Working Group. AN declares grant funding from Global Blood Therapeutics; consulting fees from Global Blood Therapeutics, Bluebird Bio, Novartis, and Dispersol; received honoraria from the American Society of Pediatric Hematology; support for meeting attendance from the Foundation for Women and Girls with Blood Disorders; serves on data safety monitoring boards for Editas Medicine, the PIVOT Trial and the PUSH UP Trail; and serves in a leadership role at the Foundation for Women and Girls with Blood Disorders' Sickle Cell Disease Learning Action Network. SL declares grant funding from Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), Maryland Community Health Resources Commission (CHRC MD) National Institutes of Health (NIH); consulting fees from Novartis, Pfizer, Bluebird Bio, Novo Nordisk, and Magenta; participates in data safety monitoring boards for Observational Study Monitoring Board, Sickle Pan-African Research Consortium (NIH) and on an ad hoc basis for American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation; serves the Vice President of the National Alliance for Sickle Cell Centers; and holds stock in Pfzier and Teva Pharmaceuticals. TW declares consulting fees from Agios Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, Fulcrum, Global Blood Therapeutics, and Bluebird Bio and support for travel provided by Agios Pharmaceuticals. ADM declares honoraria from PhenX, and support from the Arthur Wharton Foundation. All other authors have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) use for people with sickle cell disease and their families ART might be used for fertility preservation, infertility treatment, by LGBTQ couples, and for preimplantation genetic testing. (1) Sperm, eggs, ovarian tissue, and embryos can be cryopreserved as care standards whereas testicular tissue cryopreservation is experimental. (2) Embryos are made by in-vitro fertilization (IVF) at the time of fertility preservation or gametes can be used to generate embryos via IVF once pregnancy is desired. (3) Embryos can be stored, or (4) sampled for testing to assess aneuploidy, for monogenetic diseases such as sickle cell disease, or for haploidentical matching with sibling before (5) introduction to the uterus.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Optimizing health and reproductive opportunities for people with sickle cell disease

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mburu J, Odame I Sickle cell disease: Reducing the global disease burden. Int J Lab Hematol 2019;41(S1):82–8. Doi: 10.1111/ijlh.13023. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pecker LH., Sharma D, Nero A, et al. Knowledge gaps in reproductive and sexual health in girls and women with sickle cell disease. Brit J Haematol 2021;194(6):970–9. Doi: 10.1111/bjh.17658. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vayena E, Rowe PJ., Peterson HB. Assisted reproductive technology in developing countries: why should we care? Fertil Steril 2002;78(1):13–5. Doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03177-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kopeika J, Oyewo A, Punnialingam S, et al. Ovarian reserve in women with sickle cell disease. PLOS ONE 2019;14(2):e0213024. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213024.. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Garba SR., Makwe CC., Osunkalu VO., et al. Ovarian reserve in Nigerian women with sickle cell anaemia: a cross- sectional study. J Ovarian Res 2021;14(1):174. Doi: 10.1186/s13048-021-00927-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed