Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr:174:92-98.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.01.011. Epub 2023 Jan 26.

Prosteria - National Trends and Outcomes of More Frequent Than Guideline Recommended Prostate Specific Antigen Screening

Affiliations

Prosteria - National Trends and Outcomes of More Frequent Than Guideline Recommended Prostate Specific Antigen Screening

Dylan J Peterson et al. Urology. 2023 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To characterize national trends in and associated outcomes of more often than annual prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening, which we term "prosteria."

Methods: Men in the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart with ≥2 years from first PSA test to censoring at the end of insurance or available data (January 2003 to June 2019) or following exclusionary diagnoses or procedures, such as PCa treatment, were included. PSAs within 90 days were treated as one PSA. Prosteria was defined as having ≥3 PSA testing intervals of ≤270 days.

Results: A total of 9,734,077 PSAs on 2,958,923 men were included. The average inter-PSA testing interval was 1.5 years, and 4.5% of men had prosteria, which increased by 0.53% per year. Educated, wealthy, non-White patients were more likely to have prosteria. Men within the recommended screening age (ie 55-69) had lower rates of prosteria. Prosteria patients had higher average PSA values (2.5 vs 1.4 ng/mL), but lower values at PCa diagnosis. Prosteria was associated with biopsy and PCa diagnosis; however, there were comparable rates of treatment within 2 years of diagnosis.

Conclusion: In this large cohort study, prosteria was common, increased over time, and was associated with demographic characteristics. Importantly, there were no clinically meaningful differences in PSA values at diagnosis or rates of early treatment, suggesting prosteria leads to both overdiagnosis and overtreatment. These results support current AUA and USPTF guidelines and can be used to counsel men seeking more frequent PSA screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:. Temporal Trends in Prosteria
Distribution of PSA over the study period. 2003–2017 are displayed as there was a subsequent drop in cohort size due to patients needing 2 years of continuous enrollment with data terminating in 2019. Gray: Total PSA tests, normalized by 100,000 male enrollees at that time. Orange: Normalized number of PSA tests on patients with prosteria. Blue: Percent of PSAs on patients with prosteria. Red: Trend line for proportion of PSAs on patients with prosteria, weighted by number of PSA tests per month.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:. Survival Analyses
Panel A and B: Kaplan-Meier survival curves for prostate biopsy and PCa diagnosis since first PSA test, stratified by prosteria. Panel D-F: Survival curves for prostatectomy, radiation, hormone therapy, and any treatment from time of PCa diagnosis, stratified by prosteria.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Charatan FB FDA approves test for prostatic cancer. BMJ 309, 628–629 (1994).
    1. Welch HG & Albertsen PC Reconsidering Prostate Cancer Mortality — The Future of PSA Screening. N Engl J Med 382, 1557–1563 (2020). - PubMed
    1. Catalona WJ Prostate Cancer Screening. Med Clin North Am 102, 199–214 (2018). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Catalona WJ et al. Measurement of prostate-specific antigen in serum as a screening test for prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 324, 1156–1161 (1991). - PubMed
    1. Shoag JE, Mittal S. & Hu JC Reevaluating PSA Testing Rates in the PLCO Trial. N Engl J Med 374, 1795–1796 (2016). - PubMed

Publication types

Substances