The global prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in residents of elderly care centers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 36709300
- PMCID: PMC9884412
- DOI: 10.1186/s13756-023-01210-6
The global prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in residents of elderly care centers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a difficult to treat infection, particularly in residents of elderly care centers (ECCs). Despite the substantial burden of MRSA, an inadequate number of studies have analyzed MRSA prevalence in ECCs.
Objectives: We conducted a worldwide systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence and risk factors of MRSA in ECCs.
Methods: We searched MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases and the gray literature sources for all studies published between January 1980 and December 2022 on the prevalence of MRSA in ECCs. A random-effects model was utilized to estimate pooled prevalence rates at 95% confidence intervals (CI). Moreover, the data were analyzed based on World Health Organization-defined regions, income, and human development index levels.
Results: In total, 119 studies, including 164,717 participants from 29 countries, were found eligible for meta-analysis. The pooled global prevalence of MRSA was 14.69% (95% CI 12.39-17.15%; 16,793/164,717). Male gender [prevalence ratio (PR) = 1.55; 95% CI 1.47-1.64], previous MRSA infection (PR = 3.71; 95% CI 3.44-4.01), prior use of antibiotics (PR = 1.97; 95% CI 1.83-2.12), hospitalized within the previous year (PR = 1.32; 95% CI 1.20-1.45), have had any wound (PR = 2.38; 95% CI 2.23-2.55), have used urinary catheter (PR = 2.24; 95% CI 2.06-2.43), have used any medical device (PR = 1.78; 95% CI 1.66-1.91), and those with diabetes (PR = 1.55; CI 1.43-1.67) were more likely to be colonized by MRSA than other patients.
Conclusion: Screening programs and preventive measures should target MRSA in ECCs due to the high global prevalence rates.
Keywords: Long-term care; Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Nursing homes; Residential facilities; Systematic review.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Suzman R, Beard JR, Boerma T, Chatterji S. Health in an ageing world—what do we know? Lancet. 2015;385(9967):484–486. - PubMed
-
- Wong JW, Ip M, Tang A, Wei VW, Wong SY, Riley S, Read JM, Kwok KO. Prevalence and risk factors of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage in Asia-Pacific region from 2000 to 2016: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Epidemiol. 2018;10:1489–1501. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Naja S, Din Makhlouf MME, Chehab MAH. An ageing world of the 21st century: a literature review. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2017;4(12):4363–4369.
-
- Tarakcı E, Zenginler Y, Kaya Mutlu E. Chronic pain, depression symptoms and daily living independency level among geriatrics in nursing home. Agri. 2015;27(1):35–41. - PubMed
-
- McClean P, Hughes C, Tunney M, Goossens H, Jans B, Group obotESoACNHP. Jans B, Stroobants R, Goossens H, Budimir A, et al. Antimicrobial prescribing in European nursing homes. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66(7):1609–1616. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical