Microplastics affect soybean rhizosphere microbial composition and function during vegetative and reproductive stages
- PMID: 36709538
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.114577
Microplastics affect soybean rhizosphere microbial composition and function during vegetative and reproductive stages
Abstract
Microplastics (MPs) are emerging contaminants in agricultural soil, whereas their effects on the rhizosphere microbial ecosystems and biogeochemical nitrogen cycles during plant growth remain unknown. Here, a 70-day greenhouse experiment was carried out with black and fluvo-aquic soil to evaluate the influence of polyamide (PA), polyethylene (PE), polyester (PES), and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) MPs on the bacterial communities and functions in the soybean rhizosphere. The PA treatment consistently affected the rhizobacterial alpha diversity in the fluvo-aquic soil at soybean vegetative and reproductive growth stages, whereas the PE, PES, and PVC treatments had a short-term effect on the bacterial alpha diversity. At two growth stages, 6 and 23 biomarkers were consistently abundant in the PA treatment in the black soil and fluvo-aquic soil, respectively, and order Rhizobiales was found to be a biomarker for PA MPs contamination in both soils. Additionally, PA treatment decreased bacterial network complexity and tightness, whereas the effects of the PE, PES, and PVC on bacterial co-occurrence patterns varied depending on the soil types. Furthermore, PES and PVC treatments inhibited ammonification processes in the soybean rhizosphere, and PE could temporarily inhibit ammonia oxidation and denitrification processes according to the variations of N-cycling gene abundances. These effects on soil N-cycling also varied with soil types and soybean growth stages. This study provides profound information for understanding of MPs residues on the assembly of the soybean rhizosphere communities and function during plant development.
Keywords: Biomarkers; Co-occurrence network; Function structure; Microplastics; Soybean rhizosphere.
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Microplastics affect the nitrogen nutrition status of soybean by altering the nitrogen cycle in the rhizosphere soil.J Hazard Mater. 2025 Jun 15;490:137803. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.137803. Epub 2025 Mar 3. J Hazard Mater. 2025. PMID: 40043389
-
Microplastic particles alter wheat rhizosphere soil microbial community composition and function.J Hazard Mater. 2022 Aug 15;436:129176. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129176. Epub 2022 May 18. J Hazard Mater. 2022. PMID: 35739711
-
Biodegradable Microplastic-Driven Change in Soil pH Affects Soybean Rhizosphere Microbial N Transformation Processes.J Agric Food Chem. 2024 Jul 31;72(30):16674-16686. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.4c04206. Epub 2024 Jul 18. J Agric Food Chem. 2024. PMID: 39021203
-
[Advances in Research of the Effects and Mechanisms of Polyethylene Microplastics on Soil Nitrogen Transformation].Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2024 Aug 8;45(8):4756-4765. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202308166. Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2024. PMID: 39168693 Review. Chinese.
-
Effects of micro(nano)plastics on higher plants and the rhizosphere environment.Sci Total Environ. 2022 Feb 10;807(Pt 1):150841. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150841. Epub 2021 Oct 8. Sci Total Environ. 2022. PMID: 34627902 Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources