Simulation-based education to improve management of refractory anaphylaxis in an allergy clinic
- PMID: 36710363
- PMCID: PMC9885607
- DOI: 10.1186/s13223-023-00764-9
Simulation-based education to improve management of refractory anaphylaxis in an allergy clinic
Abstract
Background: High-fidelity simulations based on real-life clinical scenarios have frequently been used to improve patient care, knowledge and teamwork in the acute care setting. Still, they are seldom included in the allergy-immunology curriculum or continuous medical education. Our main goal was to assess if critical care simulations in allergy improved performance in the clinical setting.
Methods: Advanced anaphylaxis scenarios were designed by a panel of emergency, intensive care unit, anesthesiology and allergy-immunology specialists and then adapted for the adult allergy clinic setting. This simulation activity included a first part in the high-fidelity simulation-training laboratory and a second at the adult allergy clinic involving actors and a high-fidelity mannequin. Participants filled out a questionnaire, and qualitative interviews were performed with staff after they had managed cases of refractory anaphylaxis.
Results: Four nurses, seven allergy-immunology fellows and six allergy/immunologists underwent the simulation. Questionnaires showed a perceived improvement in aspects of crisis and anaphylaxis management. The in-situ simulation revealed gaps in the process, which were subsequently resolved. Qualitative interviews with participants revealed a more rapid and orderly response and improved confidence in their abilities and that of their colleagues to manage anaphylaxis.
Conclusion: High-fidelity simulations can improve the management of anaphylaxis in the allergy clinic and team confidence. This activity was instrumental in reducing staff reluctance to perform high-risk challenges in the ambulatory setting, thus lifting a critical barrier for implementing oral immunotherapy at our adult center.
Keywords: Allergic emergencies; Allergy clinic; Ambulatory setting; Anaphylaxis; Anaphylaxis management; High fidelity simulation based-learning; Medical education; Teamwork.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
RG—Investigator for Boehringer Ingelheim, Astra Zeneca, Merk, GSK, Novartis, Stallergene, DBV, Sanofi, Green Cross, Advisor committee for Novartis, Aralez, Mylan, ALK, Presenter for Merk, Pfizer, Astram Aralez, Pediapharm, Novartis. MV—member of Ezdrips (non-profit organization). PB–PB received research grants from Novartis, Sanofi, Regeneron and DBV Technologies and personal fees from Novartis, Aralez, Sanofi-Genzyme, Bausch Health, ALK, Astra-Zeneca, Valeo and Pfizer, unrelated to this work. AC, FG, NN, AR, MB, DC, AD, JP—No conflict of interest.
Figures



References
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources