Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun;26(6):1185-1193.
doi: 10.1017/S1368980023000198. Epub 2023 Jan 30.

Understanding weight status and dietary intakes among Australian school children by remoteness: a cross-sectional study

Affiliations

Understanding weight status and dietary intakes among Australian school children by remoteness: a cross-sectional study

Jane Jacobs et al. Public Health Nutr. 2023 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether primary school children's weight status and dietary behaviours vary by remoteness as defined by the Australian Modified Monash Model (MMM).

Design: A cross-sectional study design was used to conduct secondary analysis of baseline data from primary school students participating in a community-based childhood obesity trial. Logistic mixed models estimated associations between remoteness, measured weight status and self-reported dietary intake.

Setting: Twelve regional and rural Local Government Areas in North-East Victoria, Australia.

Participants: Data were collected from 2456 grade 4 (approximately 9-10 years) and grade 6 (approximately 11-12 years) students.

Results: The final sample included students living in regional centres (17·4 %), large rural towns (25·6 %), medium rural towns (15·1 %) and small rural towns (41·9 %). Weight status did not vary by remoteness. Compared to children in regional centres, those in small rural towns were more likely to meet fruit consumption guidelines (OR: 1·75, 95 % CI (1·24, 2·47)) and had higher odds of consuming fewer takeaway meals (OR: 1·37, 95 % CI (1·08, 1·74)) and unhealthy snacks (OR = 1·58, 95 % CI (1·15, 2·16)).

Conclusions: Living further from regional centres was associated with some healthier self-reported dietary behaviours. This study improves understanding of how dietary behaviours may differ across remoteness levels and highlights that public health initiatives may need to take into account heterogeneity across communities.

Keywords: Childhood obesity; Dietary intake; Health inequalities; Rural health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Outcomes from separate logistic mixed models, school as random effect, adjusted for sex, grade and IRSAD tertile. IRSAD, Index of Relative Socio-economic Advantage and Disadvantage

References

    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2019) Australia’s Children: Overweight and Obesity. Canberra: AIHW.
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2019) Rural and Remote Health. Cat no. PHE255. Canberra: AIHW.
    1. Biehl A, Hovengen R, Grøholt E-K et al. (2013) Adiposity among children in Norway by urbanity and maternal education: a nationally representative study. BMC Public Health 13, 842. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Johnson JA & Johnson AM (2015) Urban-rural differences in childhood and adolescent obesity in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Child Obes 11, 233–241. - PubMed
    1. Sjöberg A, Moraeus L, Yngve A et al. (2011) Overweight and obesity in a representative sample of schoolchildren – exploring the urban-rural gradient in Sweden. Obes Rev 12, 305–314. - PubMed

Publication types

Supplementary concepts