Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2022 Oct 25;24(1):1-6.
doi: 10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597. eCollection 2023.

Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher

Virginia Braun  1 , Victoria Clarke  2
Affiliations
Editorial

Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher

Virginia Braun et al. Int J Transgend Health. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Barlo, S., Boyd, W. E., Pelizzon, A., & Wilson, S. (2020). Yarning as protected space: Principles and protocols. AlterNative, 16(2), 90–98. 10.1177/1177180120917480 - DOI
    1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa - DOI
    1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2016). (Mis)conceptualising themes, thematic analysis, and other problems with Fugard and Potts’ (2015) sample-size tool for thematic analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19(6), 739–743. 10.1080/13645579.2016.1195588 - DOI
    1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise & Health, 11(4), 589–597. 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806 - DOI
    1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021a). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238 - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources