Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 1;27(1):e43-e49.
doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1743286. eCollection 2023 Jan.

Upper Airway Stimulation in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Long-Term Surgical Success, Respiratory Outcomes, and Patient Experience

Christianne C A F M Veugen  1   2   3 , Eveline Dieleman  4 , Johannes A Hardeman  5 , Robert J Stokroos  2 , Marcel P Copper  1
Affiliations

Upper Airway Stimulation in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Long-Term Surgical Success, Respiratory Outcomes, and Patient Experience

Christianne C A F M Veugen et al. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. .

Abstract

Introduction Upper airway stimulation (UAS) with electric activation of the hypoglossal nerve has emerged as a promising treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea. Objective To retrospectively analyze objective and subjective outcome measures after long-term follow-up in obstructive sleep apnea patients receiving upper airway stimulation. Methods An observational retrospective single-center cohort study including a consecutive series of patients diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea receiving upper airway stimulation. Results Twenty-five patients were included. The total median apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) significantly decreased from 37.4 to 8.7 events per hour at the 12-month follow-up ( p < 0.001). The surgical success rate was 96%. Adverse events were reported by 28% of the patients. Conclusion Upper airway stimulation is an effective and safe treatment for obstructive sleep apnea in patients with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) failure or intolerance. However, it is possible that the existing in and exclusion criteria for UAS therapy in the Netherlands have positively influenced our results.

Keywords: electric stimulation therapy; hypoglossal nerve; implantable neurostimulators; obstructive sleep apnea; patient satisfaction; treatment outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interests The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.

References

    1. American Academy of Sleep Medicine Task Force . Sleep-related breathing disorders in adults: recommendations for syndrome definition and measurement techniques in clinical research. The Report of an American Academy of Sleep Medicine Task Force. Sleep. 1999;22(05):667–689. - PubMed
    1. Sullivan C E, Issa F G, Berthon-Jones M, Eves L.Reversal of obstructive sleep apnoea by continuous positive airway pressure applied through the nares Lancet 19811(8225):862–865. - PubMed
    1. Lindberg E, Berne C, Elmasry A, Hedner J, Janson C. CPAP treatment of a population-based sample–what are the benefits and the treatment compliance? Sleep Med. 2006;7(07):553–560. - PubMed
    1. Lim J, Lasserson T J, Fleetham J, Wright J. Oral appliances for obstructive sleep apnoea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;2018(01):CD004435. - PubMed
    1. Sundaram S, Lim J, Lasserson T J.Surgery for obstructive sleep apnoea in adultsCochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;2017(09): - PubMed