Evaluating the Performance of the Primary Care Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5) in a Trauma-Exposed, Socioeconomically Vulnerable Patient Population
- PMID: 36715813
- PMCID: PMC9885055
- DOI: 10.1007/s10880-023-09941-9
Evaluating the Performance of the Primary Care Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5) in a Trauma-Exposed, Socioeconomically Vulnerable Patient Population
Abstract
The properties and utility of the Primary Care PTSD Screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5) remain unstudied in community-based populations. This study evaluates the performance of the PC-PTSD-5 to determine whether it can be used as a brief alternative to the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) in a large public hospital in the southeastern United States. Participants (N = 422; 92.7% Black; 85.8% female; Mage = 42.0 years, SDage = 13.4 years) completed the PCL-5 and PC-PTSD-5 after recruitment from medical clinic waiting rooms and admission lists. Using chance-corrected test quality indices and item response theory (IRT) analyses, we determined optimal cut-scores for screening and examined item performance. Approximately 45.0% of the sample screened positive for probable DSM-5 PTSD using the PCL-5. The PC-PTSD-5 demonstrated high internal consistency and strong associations with PCL-5 scores (total, r = .79; items, rs = .51-.61). A cut-score of one was optimally sensitive for screening (κ[1] = .96), and a cut-score of four had the highest quality of probable efficiency (κ[.5] = .66) for detecting self-reported DSM-5 PTSD on the PCL-5. IRT analyses indicated Item 1 (nightmares, intrusive memories) provided the most information, and other items may not be incrementally useful for this sample. Findings provide preliminary support for the use of the PC-PTSD-5 as a brief alternative to the PCL-5 among chronically trauma-exposed patients in the public healthcare setting.
Keywords: Healthcare; PC-PTSD-5; Posttraumatic stress disorder; Primary care; Safety net hospital; Screening.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Emma C. Lathan, Jessica M. Petri, Tamara Haynes, Stan C. Sonu, Yara Mekawi, Vasiliki Michopoulos, and Abigail Powers have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures
References
-
- Agresti A. Categorical data analysis. John Wiley & Sons; 1990.
-
- American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®) American Psychiatric Pub; 2013.
-
- Beckett, L., & Jacobs, B. (2014). Chart: Trauma hospitals fail to screen for civilian PTSD. ProPublica. Retrieved from https://projects.propublica.org/graphics/ptsd
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical