Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec;30(4):791-803.
doi: 10.1007/s10880-023-09941-9. Epub 2023 Jan 30.

Evaluating the Performance of the Primary Care Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5) in a Trauma-Exposed, Socioeconomically Vulnerable Patient Population

Affiliations

Evaluating the Performance of the Primary Care Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5) in a Trauma-Exposed, Socioeconomically Vulnerable Patient Population

Emma C Lathan et al. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2023 Dec.

Abstract

The properties and utility of the Primary Care PTSD Screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5) remain unstudied in community-based populations. This study evaluates the performance of the PC-PTSD-5 to determine whether it can be used as a brief alternative to the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) in a large public hospital in the southeastern United States. Participants (N = 422; 92.7% Black; 85.8% female; Mage = 42.0 years, SDage = 13.4 years) completed the PCL-5 and PC-PTSD-5 after recruitment from medical clinic waiting rooms and admission lists. Using chance-corrected test quality indices and item response theory (IRT) analyses, we determined optimal cut-scores for screening and examined item performance. Approximately 45.0% of the sample screened positive for probable DSM-5 PTSD using the PCL-5. The PC-PTSD-5 demonstrated high internal consistency and strong associations with PCL-5 scores (total, r = .79; items, rs = .51-.61). A cut-score of one was optimally sensitive for screening (κ[1] = .96), and a cut-score of four had the highest quality of probable efficiency (κ[.5] = .66) for detecting self-reported DSM-5 PTSD on the PCL-5. IRT analyses indicated Item 1 (nightmares, intrusive memories) provided the most information, and other items may not be incrementally useful for this sample. Findings provide preliminary support for the use of the PC-PTSD-5 as a brief alternative to the PCL-5 among chronically trauma-exposed patients in the public healthcare setting.

Keywords: Healthcare; PC-PTSD-5; Posttraumatic stress disorder; Primary care; Safety net hospital; Screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Emma C. Lathan, Jessica M. Petri, Tamara Haynes, Stan C. Sonu, Yara Mekawi, Vasiliki Michopoulos, and Abigail Powers have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Test information function (IIF) for PC-PTSD-5
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Item information function (IIF) for PC-PTSD-5 items

References

    1. Agresti A. Categorical data analysis. John Wiley & Sons; 1990.
    1. American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®) American Psychiatric Pub; 2013.
    1. Asnaani A, Hall-Clark B. Recent development in understanding ethnocultural and race differences in trauma exposure and PTSD. Current Opinion in Psychology. 2017;14:96–101. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.12.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beckett, L., & Jacobs, B. (2014). Chart: Trauma hospitals fail to screen for civilian PTSD. ProPublica. Retrieved from https://projects.propublica.org/graphics/ptsd
    1. Blevins CA, Weathers FW, Davis MT, Witte TK, Domino JL. The posttraumatic stress disorder checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): Development and initial psychometric evaluation. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 2015;28(6):489–498. doi: 10.1002/jts.22059. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources