Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 May;11(3):567-578.
doi: 10.1007/s43390-022-00638-x. Epub 2023 Jan 30.

The natural history of curve behavior after brace removal in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a literature review

Affiliations
Review

The natural history of curve behavior after brace removal in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a literature review

Scott Luhmann et al. Spine Deform. 2023 May.

Abstract

Purpose: Brace treatment is the most common nonoperative treatment to prevent curve progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The goal of this review and analysis is to characterize curve behavior after completion of brace treatment and to identify factors that may facilitate the estimation of long-term curve progression.

Method: A review of the English language literature was completed using the MEDLINE (PUBMED) database of publications after 1990 until September 2020. Studies were included if they detailed a minimum of 1 year post-brace removal follow-up of AIS patients. Data retrieved from the articles included Cobb angle measurements of the major curves at "in-brace," weaning, and follow-up visit(s) for all patients described and for subset populations.

Results: From 75 articles, 18 relevant studies describing a follow-up period of 1-25 years following brace removal were included in the analyses. The reviewed literature demonstrates that curves continue to progress after brace treatment is completed with three main phases of progression: (i) immediate (upon brace removal) where a mean curve progression of 7° occurs; (ii) short term (within five years of brace removal) where a relatively high progression rate is evident (0.8°/year); and (iii) long term (more than five years after brace removal) where the progression rate slows (0.2°/year). The magnitude and rate of curve progression is mainly dependent on the degree of curve at weaning as curves weaned at < 25° progress substantially less than curves weaned at ≥ 25° at 25 years.

Conclusion: Curves continue to progress after brace removal and the rate and magnitude of progression are associated with the curve size at weaning, with larger curves typically exhibiting more rapid and severe progression. This analysis provides physicians and patients the ability to estimate long-term curve size based on the curve size at the time of weaning.

Level of evidence: IV.

Keywords: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Brace treatment; Curve progression.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT type flow diagram of the article selection process
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean curve progression over time. Average change in curve progression over time from “in-brace” to last available follow-up after brace removal
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Dependency of mean curve progression from in-brace to end of weaning on curve size in-brace. Curve progression during brace wear in curves measured above or equal and below 15° “in-brace”. Average “in-brace” curve Cobb angle is presented in blue and average weaning Cobb angle is presented in orange
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Rate of progression over time (from end of weaning to the last follow-up)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Curve progression rate from end of weaning to the last follow-up in dependence of curve size at end of weaning. Curve progression rate until last follow-up for curves weaned from bracing at a Cobb angle of equal and above (red) and below (blue) 25°
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Progression from in-brace to end of weaning (DM, double major; T, thoracic; TL, thoracolumbar; L, lumbar; N, sample size)
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Rate of progression over time per curve type (from weaning to the last follow-up)

References

    1. Agabegi SS, Kazemi N, Sturm PF, et al. Natural history of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in skeletally mature patients. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015;23:714–723. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00037. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Negrini S, Donzelli S, Aulisa AG, et al. 2016 SOSORT guidelines: orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2018;13:3. doi: 10.1186/s13013-017-0145-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dale ER, Kalamazoo M (2003) The Scoliosis Research Society Brace Mannual. In: SRS Bracing Man. https://www.srs.org/UserFiles/file/bracing-manual/section1.pdf
    1. Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Wright JG, et al. Design of the bracing in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis trial (BrAIST) Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013;38:1832–1841. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000435048.23726.3e. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Higgins J, Deeks J. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons; 2008. Selecting studies and collecting data.