Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 1;100(3):194-200.
doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001995. Epub 2023 Jan 30.

Slow Binocular Reading in Amblyopic Children Is a Fellow Eye Deficit

Affiliations

Slow Binocular Reading in Amblyopic Children Is a Fellow Eye Deficit

Krista R Kelly et al. Optom Vis Sci. .

Abstract

Significance: Amblyopic children read 25% slower than their peers during binocular silent reading.

Purpose: We compared binocular reading to fellow eye reading to determine whether slow reading in amblyopic children is due to binocular inhibition; that is, the amblyopic eye is interfering during binocular reading.

Methods: In a cross-sectional study, 38 children with amblyopia and 36 age-similar control children who completed grades 1 to 6 were enrolled. Children silently read grade-appropriate paragraphs during binocular reading and fellow eye reading while wearing ReadAlyzer eye-tracking goggles (Compevo AB, Stockholm, Sweden). Reading rate, number of forward saccades, number of regressive saccades, and fixation duration were analyzed between groups and between viewing conditions. We also examined whether sensory factors (amblyopia severity, stereoacuity, suppression) were related to slow reading.

Results: For amblyopic children, binocular reading versus fellow eye reading did not differ for reading rate (176 ± 60 vs. 173 ± 53 words per minute, P = .69), number of forward saccades (104 ± 35 vs. 97 ± 33 saccades/100 words, P = .18), number of regressive saccades (21 ± 15 vs. 22 ± 13 saccades/100 words, P = .75), or fixation duration (0.31 ± 0.06 vs. 0.32 ± 0.07 seconds, P = .44). As expected, amblyopic children had a slower reading rate and more forward saccades than control children during binocular reading and fellow eye reading. Slow reading was not related to any sensory factors.

Conclusions: Binocular reading did not differ from fellow eye reading in amblyopic children. Thus, binocular inhibition is unlikely to play a role in slow binocular reading and is instead a fellow eye deficit that emerges from a disruption in binocular visual experience during development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosure: None of the authors have reported a financial conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Reading measures. Bar graphs depicting group means for reading rate (A), number of forward saccades (B), fixation duration (C), and number of regressive saccades (D) during binocular reading (white bars) and fellow eye (right eye for controls) reading (grey bars) for amblyopic and control children. Error bars represent ± standard error of the mean (SEM). *P < .05.

References

    1. Birch EE. Amblyopia and Binocular Vision. Prog Retin Eye Res 2013;33:67–84. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kelly KR, Jost RM, De La Cruz A, Birch EE. Amblyopic Children Read More Slowly than Controls Under Natural, Binocular Reading Conditions. J AAPOS 2015;19:515–20. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kelly KR, Jost RM, De La Cruz A, et al. Slow Reading in Children with Anisometropic Amblyopia is Associated with Fixation Instability and Increased Saccades. J AAPOS 2017;21:447–51. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Birch EE, Morale SE, Jost RM, et al. Assessing Suppression in Amblyopic Children with a Dichoptic Eye Chart. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2016;57:5649–54. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pardhan S, Gilchrist J. Binocular Contrast Summation and Inhibition in Amblyopia. The Influence of the Interocular Difference on Binocular Contrast Sensitivity. Doc Ophthalmol 1992;82:239–8. - PubMed

Publication types