Barriers to Guideline-Directed Anticoagulation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: New Approaches to an Old Problem

Abstract

Optimising guideline-directed anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation remains a perennial problem despite strong evidence for improved health outcomes with guideline-directed use of anticoagulation. Efforts to improve uptake have been hampered by barriers found at the level of the physician, patient, disease, and choice of therapy. Clinician judgement is often clouded by factors such as therapeutic inertia, aversion to bleeding risk, and implicit bias. For patients, negative preconceptions of therapy, impact of therapy on day-to-day life, and the nocebo effect pose significant barriers. Both groups are affected by poor education. Utility of a single-pronged approach directed toward clinicians or patients have demonstrated variable success, with the highest impact appreciated in studies using shared-decision models. Further, there is emerging evidence for use of integrated models of care, which have shown efficacy in improving patient outcomes, as well as use of digital platforms such as mobile app-based interventions, which can be of aid to the clinician in improving patient adherence to anticoagulation, with translated improved outcomes in clinical trials. This narrative review aims to investigate the physician and health system, patient, and drug therapy and disease barriers to uptake of guideline-directed anticoagulation in the treatment of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.