Exploring barriers to dementia screening and management services by general practitioners in China: a qualitative study using the COM-B model
- PMID: 36717818
- PMCID: PMC9886538
- DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-03756-x
Exploring barriers to dementia screening and management services by general practitioners in China: a qualitative study using the COM-B model
Abstract
Background: Dementia has become a global public health problem, and general practitioners (GPs) play a key role in diagnosing and managing dementia. However, in Chinese primary care settings, dementia is underdiagnosed and inefficiently managed, and dementia screening and management services provided by GPs are suboptimal. The reasons underlying this gap are poorly understood. This study aimed to determine the barriers that hinder GPs from actively promoting dementia screening and management, and thereby provide insights for the successful promotion of dementia screening and management services in primary care.
Methods: Purposive sampling was used. And focus groups and in-depth interviews were conducted face-to-face among GPs from community health service centers (CHSCs) in South China. Thematic analysis was used to identify barriers to screening and managing dementia and map them to the Capability/Opportunity/Motivation-Behavior model (COM-B model).
Results: Fifty-two GPs were included. The COM-B model found nine barriers to implementing dementia screening and management services in primary healthcare: (1) poor capability: lack of systematic knowledge of dementia and inadequate dementia screening skills; (2) little opportunity: unclear pathways for referral, insufficient time for dementia screening and management, lack of dementia-specific leaders, and no guarantee of services continuity; (3) low motivation: outside of GP scope, worries associated with dementia stigma rooted in culture beliefs, and insufficient financial incentives.
Conclusions: Our study concluded that GPs were not yet ready to provide dementia screening and management services due to poor capability related to knowledge and skills of dementia, little opportunity associated with an unsupportive working environment, and low motivation due to unclear duty and social pressure. Accordingly, systematic implementation strategies should be taken, including standardized dementia training programs, standardized community-based dementia guidelines, expansion of primary care workforces, development of dedicated leaders, and the eradication of stigma attached to dementia to promote dementia screening and management services in primary care.
Keywords: Capability/Opportunity/Motivation-Behavior model; Dementia screening and management; General practitioner.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Understanding diagnosis and management of dementia and guideline implementation in general practice: a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework.Implement Sci. 2014 Mar 3;9:31. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-31. Implement Sci. 2014. PMID: 24581339 Free PMC article.
-
Using COM-B model in identifying facilitators, barriers and needs of community pharmacists in implementing weight management services in Malaysia: a qualitative study.BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 19;22(1):929. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08297-4. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022. PMID: 35854383 Free PMC article.
-
'Working away in that Grey Area…' A qualitative exploration of the challenges general practitioners experience when managing behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia.Age Ageing. 2018 Mar 1;47(2):295-303. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx175. Age Ageing. 2018. PMID: 29220480 Free PMC article.
-
Qualitative systematic review of general practitioners' (GPs') views and experiences of providing postnatal care.BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 12;13(4):e070005. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070005. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 37045584 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers and facilitators to clinical behaviour change by primary care practitioners: a theory-informed systematic review of reviews using the Theoretical Domains Framework and Behaviour Change Wheel.Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 30;11(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02030-2. Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36042457 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
From suspicion of cognitive decline to dementia diagnosis: a systematic review of healthcare professionals' considerations and attitudes.Age Ageing. 2025 May 31;54(6):afaf176. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf176. Age Ageing. 2025. PMID: 40552369 Free PMC article.
-
An evaluation of a community dementia screening program in rural Kenya: DEM-SKY.Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Feb;21(2):e14513. doi: 10.1002/alz.14513. Epub 2025 Jan 14. Alzheimers Dement. 2025. PMID: 39807667 Free PMC article.
-
Attitudes and Preferences Towards Screening for Dementia From the Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals: An Updated Systematic Review.Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2025 Feb;40(2):e70057. doi: 10.1002/gps.70057. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2025. PMID: 39978789 Free PMC article.
-
Variation in dementia screening outcomes: the influence of primary care providers' occupations and knowledge, attitudes, skills.BMC Prim Care. 2025 May 28;26(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02886-y. BMC Prim Care. 2025. PMID: 40437351 Free PMC article.
-
Validity and usability for digital cognitive assessment tools to screen for mild cognitive impairment: a randomized crossover trial.J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025 Jun 11;22(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12984-025-01665-1. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025. PMID: 40500744 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Jia L, Du Y, Chu L, Zhang Z, Li F, Lyu D, Li Y, Li Y, Zhu M, Jiao H, et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and management of dementia and mild cognitive impairment in adults aged 60 years or older in China: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Public Health. 2020;5(12):e661–e671. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30185-7. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Nichols E, Szoeke CEI, Vollset SE, Abbasi N, Abd-Allah F, Abdela J, Aichour MTE, Akinyemi RO, Alahdab F, Asgedom SW, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The Lancet Neurology. 2019;18(1):88–106. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30403-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous