Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jan 24:16:317-327.
doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S393329. eCollection 2023.

Blood Culture Negative Endocarditis: A Review of Laboratory Diagnostic Approaches

Affiliations
Review

Blood Culture Negative Endocarditis: A Review of Laboratory Diagnostic Approaches

Kuan-Pei Lin et al. Int J Gen Med. .

Abstract

Infective endocarditis is a potentially fatal condition, and identifying the pathogen is crucial to optimizing antibiotic treatment. While a blood culture takes time and may yield negative results, it remains the gold standard for diagnosis, blood culture-negative endocarditis, which accounts for up to 20% of infective endocarditis cases, poses a clinical challenge with increasing mortality. To better understand the etiology of blood culture-negative infective endocarditis, we reviewed non-culture-based strategies and compared the results. Serology tests work best in limited pathogens, such as Coxiella burnetii and Bartonella infections. Most of the pathogens identified by broad-range PCR tests are Streptococcus spp, Staphylococcus spp and Propionibacterium spp. adding specific real-time PCR assays to the systematic PCR testing of patients with blood culture-negative endocarditis will increase the efficiency of diagnosis. Recently, metagenomic next-generation sequencing has also shown promising results.

Keywords: PCR; Streptococcus; diagnosis; endocarditis; metagenomic sequencing; serology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A pragmatic approach for determining the causative organism in suspected endocarditis.

References

    1. Houpikian P, Raoult D. Blood culture-negative endocarditis in a reference center: etiologic diagnosis of 348 cases. Medicine. 2005;84(3):162–173. doi:10.1097/01.md.0000165658.82869.17 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lamas CC, Eykyn SJ. Blood culture negative endocarditis: analysis of 63 cases presenting over 25 years. Heart. 2003;89(3):258–262. doi:10.1136/heart.89.3.258 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liesman RM, Pritt BS, Maleszewski JJ, Patel R. Laboratory diagnosis of infective endocarditis. J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55(9):2599–2608. doi:10.1128/jcm.00635-17 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fournier PE, Gouriet F, Casalta JP, et al. Blood culture-negative endocarditis: improving the diagnostic yield using new diagnostic tools. Medicine. 2017;96(47):e8392. doi:10.1097/md.0000000000008392 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Godfrey R, Curtis S, Schilling WH, James PR. Blood culture negative endocarditis in the modern era of 16S rRNA sequencing. Clin Med. 2020;20(4):412–416. doi:10.7861/clinmed.2019-0342 - DOI - PMC - PubMed