Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb;114(1):43-57.
doi: 10.1111/tesg.12542. Epub 2022 Dec 21.

Street Experiments and COVID-19: Challenges, Responses and Systemic Change

Affiliations

Street Experiments and COVID-19: Challenges, Responses and Systemic Change

Lennert Verhulst et al. Tijdschr Econ Soc Geogr. 2023 Feb.

Abstract

Cities have introduced street experiments, among others, in order to cope with the urgent health challenges caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. They are primarily intended to allow people to move safely in urban spaces according to physical distancing requirements. It has been suggested that street experiments have the potential to not only respond to pressing needs, but to also trigger systemic change in mobility. This paper explores urban case studies and demonstrates how pandemic-induced street experiments provide a solution to specific challenges to mobility and public space. There are, however, issues concerning equity and citizen participation. Finally, we find that pandemic-induced street experiments have a higher acceptance among the public and authorities, a more permanent character and a greater embeddedness in long-term planning agendas. The paper concludes that the pandemic stimulated the introduction of street experiments and fostered their potential to enable systemic change in urban mobility.

Keywords: COVID‐19; public space; street experiments; systemic change; tactical urbanism; urban mobility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Street experiments as a means to social life.

References

    1. Abdullah, M. , Dias C., Muley D. & Shahin M. (2020), Exploring the Impacts of COVID‐19 on Travel Behavior and Mode Preferences. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives 8, 100255. 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100255. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abercrombie, L.C. , Sallis J.F., Conway T.L., Frank L.D., Saelens B.E. & Chapman J.E. (2008), Income and Racial Disparities in Access to Public Parks and Private Recreation Facilities. American Journal Of Preventive Medicine 34(1), pp. 9–15. 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.09.030. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adminaité‐Fodor, D. & Jost G. (2020), How Safe is Walking and Cycling in Europe? Brussels: PIN Flash Report. European Transport Safety Council. https://etsc.eu/wp‐content/uploads/PIN‐Flash‐38_FINAL.pdf.
    1. Beeckmans, L. & Oosterlynck S. (2021), Lessons from the Lockdown: Foregrounding Non‐Privileged Perspectives into the (Post‐) Covid City Debate. In: van Melik R., Filion P. & Doucet B., (eds.), Volume 3: Public Space and Mobility: Global Reflections on Covid‐19 and Urban Inequalities, pp. 35–46. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
    1. Bertolini, L. (2020), From “Streets for Traffic” to “Streets for People”: Can Street Experiments Transform Urban Mobility? Transport Reviews 40(6), pp. 734–753. 10.1080/01441647.2020.1761907. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources