Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jan;128(1):103-112.
doi: 10.1007/s11547-022-01578-2. Epub 2023 Jan 31.

Cervical spine injury: clinical and medico-legal overview

Affiliations
Review

Cervical spine injury: clinical and medico-legal overview

Christian Zanza et al. Radiol Med. 2023 Jan.

Abstract

Spinal trauma is an important cause of disability worldwide. Injury to the cervical spine (CS) occurs frequently after major trauma. 5-10% of patients with blunt trauma have a cervical spine injury. The cervical spine accounts for ~ 50% of all spinal injuries. Determination of CS stability is a common challenge in the acute care setting of patients with trauma. Several issues, indeed, are of particular concern: who needs CS imaging; what imaging should be obtained; when should computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or flexion/extension (F/E) radiographs be obtained; and how is significant ligamentous injury excluded in the comatose patient. CT and MRI both have roles to play. This article aims to present the different imaging to frame techniques to be used with greater precision in the acute event also for the purpose of planning the next therapeutic process. An overview of the applicability of the same methods in forensic pathology is also provided highlighting possible future biomarker to ease in diagnosis of acute TBI.

Keywords: Canadian C-spine rule; Cervical spine imaging; Cervical spine injury; NEXUS criteria; Post-mortem imaging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have not disclosed any competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Burst fracture, CT scan axial view
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Burst fracture, CT scan, sagittal view
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Wedge fracture, MRI, sagittal view
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Rotational fracture-dislocation mechanism, CT scan, coronal view
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Rotational fracture-dislocation mechanism, CT scan, sagittal view
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
The Canadian C-spine Rule. For patients with a GCS (Glasgow Coma Scale) 15, hemodynamic stability, the presence of risk factors guides the role of imaging. Dangerous mechanisms describes falls ≥ 5 stairs, high-speed (> 100 km/h) impacts, ejections from vehicle, bicycle collision

References

    1. Nuñez DB, Zuluaga A, Fuentes-Bernardo DA, et al. Cervical spine trauma: how much more do we learn by routinely using helical CT? Radiographics. 1996;16:1307–1318. doi: 10.1148/RADIOGRAPHICS.16.6.89465372. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Como JJ, Diaz JJ, Dunham CM, et al. Practice management guidelines for identification of cervical spine injuries following trauma: update from the eastern association for the surgery of trauma practice management guidelines committee. J Trauma. 2009;67:651–659. doi: 10.1097/TA.0B013E3181AE583B. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dreizin D, Letzing M, Sliker CW, et al. Multidetector CT of blunt cervical spine trauma in adults. Radiographics. 2014;34:1842–1865. doi: 10.1148/RG.347130094. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blackmore CC, Emerson SS, Mann FA, Koepsell TD. Cervical spine imaging in patients with trauma: determination of fracture risk to optimize use. Radiology. 1999;211:759–765. doi: 10.1148/RADIOLOGY.211.3.R99JN22759. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kwon BK, Vaccaro AR, Grauer JN, et al. Subaxial cervical spine trauma. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14:78–89. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200602000-00003. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms