Investigating How People Who Self-harm Evaluate Web-Based Lived Experience Stories: Focus Group Study
- PMID: 36719729
- PMCID: PMC9929729
- DOI: 10.2196/43840
Investigating How People Who Self-harm Evaluate Web-Based Lived Experience Stories: Focus Group Study
Abstract
Background: The positive and negative effects of interacting with web-based content on mental health, and especially self-harm, are well documented. Lived experience stories are one such type of static web-based content, frequently published on health care or third-sector organization websites, as well as social media and blogs, as a form of support for those seeking help via the web.
Objective: This study aimed to increase understanding about how people who self-harm engage with and evaluate web-based lived experience stories.
Methods: Overall, 4 web-based focus groups were conducted with 13 people with recent self-harm experience (aged 16-40 years). In total, 3 example lived experience stories were read aloud to participants, who were then asked to share their reactions to the stories. Participants were also encouraged to reflect on stories previously encountered on the web. Data were analyzed thematically.
Results: Overall, 5 themes were generated: stories of recovery from self-harm and their emotional impact, impact on self-help and help-seeking behaviors, identifying with the narrator, authenticity, and language and stereotyping.
Conclusions: Lived experience stories published on the web can provide a valuable form of support for those experiencing self-harm. They can be motivating and empowering for the reader, and they have the potential to distract readers from urges to self-harm. However, these effects may be moderated by age, and narratives of recovery may demoralize older readers. Our findings have implications for organizations publishing lived experience content and for community guidelines and moderators of web-based forums in which users share their stories. These include the need to consider the narrator's age and the relatability and authenticity of their journey and the need to avoid using stigmatizing language.
Keywords: focus groups; lived experience stories; recovery; self-harm; self-help; web-based support.
©Lizzy Winstone, Becky Mars, Jennifer Ferrar, Paul Moran, Ian Penton-Voak, Lydia Grace, Lucy Biddle. Originally published in JMIR Mental Health (https://mental.jmir.org), 31.01.2023.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
References
-
- McManus S, Gunnell D, Cooper C, Bebbington PE, Howard LM, Brugha T, Jenkins R, Hassiotis A, Weich S, Appleby L. Prevalence of non-suicidal self-harm and service contact in England, 2000-14: repeated cross-sectional surveys of the general population. Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 Jul;6(7):573–81. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30188-9. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2215-0366(19)30188-9 S2215-0366(19)30188-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Mars B, Heron J, Crane C, Hawton K, Lewis G, Macleod J, Tilling K, Gunnell D. Clinical and social outcomes of adolescent self harm: population based birth cohort study. BMJ. 2014 Oct 21;349:g5954. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g5954. http://www.bmj.com/lookup/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=25335825 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Brennan C, Saraiva S, Mitchell E, Melia R, Campbell L, King N, House A. Self-harm and suicidal content online, harmful or helpful? A systematic review of the recent evidence. J Public Mental Health. 2022 Jan 05;21(1):57–69. doi: 10.1108/jpmh-09-2021-0118. - DOI
-
- Biddle L, Derges J, Goldsmith C, Donovan JL, Gunnell D. Online help for people with suicidal thoughts provided by charities and healthcare organisations: a qualitative study of users' perceptions. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020 Sep;55(9):1157–66. doi: 10.1007/s00127-020-01852-6. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32157324 10.1007/s00127-020-01852-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources