Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug;8(4):318-326.
doi: 10.1136/svn-2022-001765. Epub 2023 Jan 31.

Mechanical thrombectomy with combined stent retriever and contact aspiration versus stent retriever alone for acute large vessel occlusion: data from ANGEL-ACT registry

Collaborators, Affiliations

Mechanical thrombectomy with combined stent retriever and contact aspiration versus stent retriever alone for acute large vessel occlusion: data from ANGEL-ACT registry

Xiaochuan Huo et al. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2023 Aug.

Abstract

Background and purpose: An analysis of the ASTER 2 trial revealed similar final recanalisation levels and clinical outcomes in acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke between stent retrieval (SR) alone as a first-line mechanical thrombectomy (MT) technique (SR alone first-line) and concomitant use of contact aspiration (CA) plus SR as a first-line MT technique (SR+CA first-line). The purpose of the present study was to compare the safety and efficacy of SR+CA first-line with those of SR alone first-line for patients with LVO in China.

Methods: We conducted the present study by using the data from the ANGEL-ACT registry. We divided the selected patients into SR+CA first-line and SR alone first-line groups. We performed logistic regression and generalised linear models with adjustments to compare the angiographic and clinical outcomes, including successful/complete recanalisation after the first technique alone and all procedures, first-pass successful/complete recanalisation, number of passes, 90-day modified Rankin Scale, procedure duration, rescue treatment and intracranial haemorrhage within 24 hours.

Results: Of the 1233 enrolled patients, 1069 (86.7%) received SR alone first-line, and 164 (13.3%) received SR+CA first-line. SR+CA first-line was associated with more thrombectomy passes (3 (2-4) vs 2 (1-2); β=1.77, 95% CI=1.55 to 1.99, p<0.001), and longer procedure duration (86 (60-129) min vs 80 (50-122) min; β=10.76, 95% CI=1.08 to 20.43, p=0.029) than SR alone first-line group. Other outcomes were comparable (all p>0.05) between the two groups.

Conclusions: Patients undergoing SR+CA first-line had more thrombectomy passes and longer procedure duration than patients undergoing SR alone first-line. Additionally, we suggested that SR+CA first-line was not superior to SR alone first-line in final recanalisation level, first-pass recanalisation level and 90-day clinical outcomes in the Chinese population.

Keywords: Stroke; Thrombectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of patient selection. ACA, anterior cerebral artery; CA, contact aspiration; EVT, endovascular thrombectomy; IAT, intra-arterial thrombolysis; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; PCA, posterior cerebral artery; SR, stent retriever.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Treatment effects on the primary outcome according to exploratory subgroups. aAdjusted for the propensity score. CA, contact aspiration; ICAD, intracranial atherosclerotic disease; IVT, intravenous thrombolysis; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; SR, stent retriever; TOAST, Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment criteria.

References

    1. Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH, et al. . Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet 2016;387:1723–31. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Turc G, Kim AS. First-Line use of contact aspiration or stent retriever thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion stroke. Stroke 2019;50:2634–6. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025753 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lapergue B, Blanc R, Gory B, et al. . Effect of endovascular contact aspiration vs stent retriever on revascularization in patients with acute ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusion: the aster randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2017;318:443–52. 10.1001/jama.2017.9644 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Turk AS, Siddiqui A, Fifi JT, et al. . Aspiration thrombectomy versus stent retriever thrombectomy as first-line approach for large vessel occlusion (COMPASS): a multicentre, randomised, open label, blinded outcome, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2019;393:998–1008. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30297-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eilaghi A, Brooks J, d’Esterre C, et al. . Reperfusion is a stronger predictor of good clinical outcome than recanalization in ischemic stroke. Radiology 2013;269:240–8. 10.1148/radiol.13122327 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types