Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 27;7(2):BJGPO.2022.0099.
doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0099. Print 2023 Jun.

Optimising personal continuity: a survey of GPs' and older patients' views

Affiliations

Optimising personal continuity: a survey of GPs' and older patients' views

Lex Groot et al. BJGP Open. .

Abstract

Background: Personal continuity - having a GP who knows their patients and keeps track of them - is an important dimension of continuity of care and is associated with lower mortality rates, higher quality of life, and reduced healthcare costs. In recent decades it has become more challenging for GPs to provide personal continuity owing to changes in society and health care.

Aim: To investigate GPs' and older patients' views on personal continuity and how personal continuity can be improved.

Design & setting: Cross sectional survey study in The Netherlands.

Method: A digital and postal survey was sent to 499 GPs and 1599 patients aged 65 years or older. Results were analysed using descriptive statistics for quantitative data and thematic analysis for open questions.

Results: In total, 249 GPs and 582 patients completed the surveys. A large majority of GPs (92-99%) and patients (91-98%) felt it was important for patients to see their own GP for life events or psychosocial issues. GPs and patients provided suggestions on how personal continuity can be improved. The thematic analysis of these suggestions identified nine themes: 1) personal connection, 2) GP accessibility and availability, 3) communication about (dis)continuity, 4) GP responsibility, 5) triage, 6) time for the patient, 7) actions by third parties, 8) team continuity, and 9) GP vocational training.

Conclusion: Both GPs and older patients still place high value on personal continuity in the context of a changing society. GPs and patients provided a wide range of suggestions for improving personal continuity. The authors will use these suggestions to develop interventions for optimising personal continuity in general practice.

Keywords: Netherlands; aged; aged, 80 and over; quality of life; surveys and questionnaires; continuity of care; general practice; physician-patient relations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Schers H, Maat C, Ven C, et al. General practitioners’ views on continuity of care. Huisarts Wet. 2002; 45 (9):450–454.
    1. Schers H, Webster S, van den Hoogen H, et al. Continuity of care in general practice: a survey of patients’ views. Br J Gen Pract. 2002; 52 (479):459–462. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pereira Gray D, Sidaway-Lee K, White E, et al. Improving continuity: the clinical challenge. InnovAiT. 2016; 9 (10):635–645. doi: 10.1177/1755738016654504. - DOI
    1. Locatelli SM, Hill JN, Talbot ME, et al. Relational continuity or rapid accessibility in primary care?: a mixed-methods study of veteran preferences. Qual Manag Health Care. 2014; 23 (2):76–85. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000028. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stokes T, Tarrant C, Mainous AG, et al. Continuity of care: is the personal doctor still important? A survey of general practitioners and family physicians in England and Wales, the United States, and The Netherlands. Ann Fam Med. 2005; 3 (4):353–359. doi: 10.1370/afm.351. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources