Tobacco endgame and priority populations: a scoping review
- PMID: 36720648
- DOI: 10.1136/tc-2022-057715
Tobacco endgame and priority populations: a scoping review
Abstract
Aim: To summarise the research literature on the impacts or perceptions of policies to end tobacco use at a population level (ie, tobacco endgame policies) among people from eight priority population groups (experiencing mental illness, substance use disorders, HIV, homelessness, unemployment or low incomes, who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or intersex (LGBTQI+) or who have experienced incarceration).
Methods: Guided by JBI Scoping Review Methodology, we searched six databases for original research examining the impacts or perceptions of 12 tobacco endgame policies among eight priority populations published since 2000. We report the results according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist.
Results: Of the 18 included studies, one described perceptions of five endgame policies among people on low incomes in Aotearoa (New Zealand), and 17 focused on the effectiveness or impacts of a very low nicotine content (VLNC) cigarette standard among people experiencing mental illness (n=14), substance use disorders (n=8), low incomes (n=6), unemployment (n=1) or who identify as LGBTQI+ (n=1) in the USA. These studies provide evidence that VLNC cigarettes can reduce tobacco smoking, cigarette cravings, nicotine withdrawal and nicotine dependence among these populations.
Conclusions: Most of the tobacco endgame literature related to these priority populations focuses on VLNC cigarettes. Identified research gaps include the effectiveness of endgame policies for reducing smoking, impacts (both expected and unexpected) and policy perceptions among these priority populations.
Keywords: Co-substance use; End game; Priority/special populations; Public policy.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Closing the gaps in tobacco endgame evidence: a scoping review.Tob Control. 2022 Mar;31(2):365-375. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056579. Tob Control. 2022. PMID: 35241614
-
Public Support for Tobacco Endgame Policies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Nicotine Tob Res. 2025 Mar 24;27(4):586-597. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae149. Nicotine Tob Res. 2025. PMID: 38890771
-
'The times are changing': New Zealand smokers' perceptions of the tobacco endgame.Tob Control. 2013 Nov;22(6):395-400. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050398. Epub 2012 Jun 16. Tob Control. 2013. PMID: 22705715
-
Abrupt nicotine reduction as an endgame policy: a randomised trial.Tob Control. 2015 Dec;24(e4):e251-7. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051801. Epub 2014 Nov 14. Tob Control. 2015. PMID: 25398562 Clinical Trial.
-
Reducing the nicotine content of combusted tobacco products sold in New Zealand.Tob Control. 2017 Mar;26(e1):e37-e42. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053186. Epub 2016 Sep 26. Tob Control. 2017. PMID: 27672126
Cited by
-
Centering equity and justice in tobacco control.Tob Control. 2024 Nov 10;33(e2):e141-e142. doi: 10.1136/tc-2024-058767. Tob Control. 2024. PMID: 39528266 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Evaluations of Compliance With California's First Tobacco Sales Bans and Tobacco Marketing in Restricted and Cross-Border Stores.Nicotine Tob Res. 2024 Aug 22;26(9):1159-1165. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae043. Nicotine Tob Res. 2024. PMID: 38430219 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources