Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar;15(3):819-828.
doi: 10.1111/os.13636. Epub 2023 Jan 31.

Role of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Complex in Spinal Deformity Secondary to Surgical Resection of the Intradural Tumor

Affiliations

Role of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Complex in Spinal Deformity Secondary to Surgical Resection of the Intradural Tumor

Xiang Yin et al. Orthop Surg. 2023 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: In most cases, complete resection of the intradural tumor is accompanied by long-term neurological complications. Postoperative spinal deformity is the most common complication after surgical resection of intradural tumors, and posterior longitudinal ligament complex (PLC) plays an important role in postoperative spinal deformity. In this study, we investigated the role of PLC in spinal deformity after the surgical treatment of intradural tumors.

Methods: We analyzed the data of 218 consecutive patients who underwent intradural tumor resection from 2000 to 2018 in this retrospective study. Before 2010, patients underwent laminoplasty without maintaining the integrity of PLC (laminoplasty group, n = 155). After 2010, patients performed single-port laminoplasty to maintain the integrity of PLC (laminoplasty retain posterior ligament complex group, n = 63). The score of quality of life, painful cortex, spinal cord movement, progressive kyphosis or scoliosis, perioperative morbidity, and neurological results were analyzed in the laminoplasty group and laminoplasty retain posterior ligament complex group. The distributed variable was shown as mean ± standard deviation and an independent t-test or one-way analysis of variance was calculated.

Results: There are 155 patients (71.1%) included in the laminoplasty group, and 63 patients (28.9%) in the laminoplasty retain posterior ligament complex group. The average age of patients was 42 ± 2.3 years, and the average modified McCormick score was 2. There were 158 (72.4%) patients with intramedullary tumors and 115 (52.7%) patients with extramedullary tumors. The length of hospital stays (8 days vs. 6 days; p = 0.023) and discharge to inpatient rehabilitation (48.4% vs. 26.9%; p = 0.012) were significantly lower in the laminoplasty retain posterior ligament complex group than the laminoplasty group. There was no significant difference in the risk of progressive deformity between the two groups at 18 months after surgery (relative risk 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43-1.25; p = 0.258) and at 20 months after surgery (relative risk 0.24; 95% CI 0.21-2.1).

Conclusion: Laminoplasty retains posterior ligament complex showed no impact on the spinal deformities compared with laminoplasty, but significantly improved the postoperative spinal activity, alleviated pain symptoms, and reduced hospital recovery time.

Keywords: Intradural Spinal Tumor; Laminoplasty; Pain; Posterior Ligaments Complex; Spinal Deformity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT 2010 flow diagram.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A female patient, 60 years old, neurofibromatoma in laminoplasty with posterior ligament complex retention (A shows that preoperative lumbar MRI examination T2W1 shows that the tumor is located in the chest 10‐lumbar four vertebral tube, completely under the epidural membrane; B shows that postoperative lumbar vertebrae positive side plate shows a fixed titanium plate).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Incidence of progressive radiographic deformity as a function of time after tumor resection via the Kaplan–Meier method in the all patients (A), children (B), adult population (C).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jin MC, Ho AL, Feng AY, Medress ZA, Pendharkar AV, Rezaii P, et al. Prediction of discharge status and readmissions after resection of intradural spinal tumors. Neurospine. 2022;19(1):133–45. 10.14245/ns.2143244.622 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Noordhof RK, Vinke S, Kurt E. Spinal cord stimulation in patients suffering from chronic pain after surgery for spinal intradural tumors: a case report and literature summary. Pain Pract. 2022;22(8):746–52. 10.1111/papr.13156 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sommer F, Hussain I, Kirnaz S, Goldberg J, McGrath L, Navarro‐Ramirez R, et al. Safety and feasibility of augmented reality assistance in minimally invasive and open resection of benign intradural extramedullary tumors. Neurospine. 2022;19(3):501–12. 10.14245/ns.2244222.111 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ebrahimi R, Sohi ASM, Mirsardoo A, Moosavi N, Khonji MS. Primary intradural extramedullary Ewing sarcoma in the lumbar area: a case report. Radiol Case Rep. 2022;17(12):4617–21. 10.1016/j.radcr.2022.09.033 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Elsamadicy AA, Koo AB, Reeves BC, Pennington Z, Sarkozy M, Hersh A, et al. Hospital frailty risk score and healthcare resource utilization after surgery for primary spinal Intradural/cord tumors. Global Spine J. 2022;21925682211069937. 10.1177/21925682211069937 - DOI - PMC - PubMed