Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023:2545:279-295.
doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2561-3_15.

Inference of Polyploid Origin and Inheritance Mode from Population Genomic Data

Affiliations

Inference of Polyploid Origin and Inheritance Mode from Population Genomic Data

Alison Dawn Scott et al. Methods Mol Biol. 2023.

Abstract

Whole-genome duplications yield varied chromosomal pairing patterns, ranging from strictly bivalent to multivalent, resulting in disomic and polysomic inheritance modes. In the bivalent case, homeologous chromosomes form pairs, where in a multivalent pattern all copies are homologous and are therefore free to pair and recombine. As sufficient sequencing data is more readily available than high-quality cytological assessments of meiotic behavior or population genetic assessment of allelic segregation, especially for non-model organisms, bioinformatics approaches to infer origins and inheritance modes of polyploids using short-read sequencing data are attractive. Here we describe two such approaches, where the first is based on distributions of allelic read depth at heterozygous sites within an individual, as the expectations of such distributions are different for disomic and polysomic inheritance modes. The second approach is more laborious and based on a phylogenetic assessment of partially phased haplotypes of a polyploid in comparison to the closest diploid relatives. We discuss the sources of deviations from expected inheritance patterns, advantages and pitfalls of both methods, effects of mating types on the performance of the methods, and possible future developments.

Keywords: Disomic, tetrasomic, polysomic, and mixed inheritance modes; Homeologous exchanges, selfing, outcrossing; Polyploidy; Rediploidization.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Stebbins GL Jr (1947) Types of polyploids; their classification and significance. Adv Genet 1:403–429
    1. Li Z, McKibben MTW, Finch GS et al (2021) Patterns and processes of diploidization in land plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 72:387–410
    1. Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Rieseberg LH (1993) Molecular data and the dynamic nature of polyploidy. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci 12:243–273
    1. Ramsey J, Schemske DW (2002) Neopolyploidy in flowering plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:589–639
    1. Muller HJ (1914) A new mode of segregation in Gregory’s tetraploid primulas. Am Nat 48:508–512

LinkOut - more resources