Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 31;13(1):1794.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28164-4.

Development and evaluation of deep learning algorithms for assessment of acute burns and the need for surgery

Affiliations

Development and evaluation of deep learning algorithms for assessment of acute burns and the need for surgery

Constance Boissin et al. Sci Rep. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Assessment of burn extent and depth are critical and require very specialized diagnosis. Automated image-based algorithms could assist in performing wound detection and classification. We aimed to develop two deep-learning algorithms that respectively identify burns, and classify whether they require surgery. An additional aim assessed the performances in different Fitzpatrick skin types. Annotated burn (n = 1105) and background (n = 536) images were collected. Using a commercially available platform for deep learning algorithms, two models were trained and validated on 70% of the images and tested on the remaining 30%. Accuracy was measured for each image using the percentage of wound area correctly identified and F1 scores for the wound identifier; and area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve, sensitivity, and specificity for the wound classifier. The wound identifier algorithm detected an average of 87.2% of the wound areas accurately in the test set. For the wound classifier algorithm, the AUC was 0.885. The wound identifier algorithm was more accurate in patients with darker skin types; the wound classifier was more accurate in patients with lighter skin types. To conclude, image-based algorithms can support the assessment of acute burns with relatively good accuracy although larger and different datasets are needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Mikael Lundin and Johan Lundin are founders and co-owners of Aiforia Technologies Oy, Helsinki, Finland. Other authors have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve. Wound classifier algorithm (surgery needed versus no surgery needed). (a) Combined model. (b) Model with training and testing only on lighter skin types. (c) Model with training and testing only on darker skin types.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jeschke MG, van Baar ME, Choudhry MA, Chung KK, Gibran NS, Logsetty S. Burn injury. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2020 doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-0145-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Global Health Estimates 2016: Estimated deaths by cause and region, 2000 and 2016. (2017).
    1. Peck MD. Epidemiology of burns throughout the world. Part I: Distribution and risk factors. Burns. 2011;37(7):1087–1100. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2011.06.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. den Hollander D, Mars M. Smart phones make smart referrals. Burns. 2016 doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.07.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. den Hollander D, Albertyn R, Amber J. Palliation, end-of-life care and burns; concepts, decision-making and communication—A narrative review. Afr. J. Emerg. Med. 2020;10(2):95–98. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2020.01.003. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types