Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023;107(2):21.
doi: 10.1007/s10846-022-01793-z. Epub 2023 Jan 27.

A Survey of Robotic Harvesting Systems and Enabling Technologies

Leonidas Droukas  1 , Zoe Doulgeri  1 , Nikolaos L Tsakiridis  1 , Dimitra Triantafyllou  2 , Ioannis Kleitsiotis  2 , Ioannis Mariolis  2 , Dimitrios Giakoumis  2 , Dimitrios Tzovaras  2 , Dimitrios Kateris  3 , Dionysis Bochtis  3
Affiliations
Review

A Survey of Robotic Harvesting Systems and Enabling Technologies

Leonidas Droukas et al. J Intell Robot Syst. 2023.

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive review of ground agricultural robotic systems and applications with special focus on harvesting that span research and commercial products and results, as well as their enabling technologies. The majority of literature concerns the development of crop detection, field navigation via vision and their related challenges. Health monitoring, yield estimation, water status inspection, seed planting and weed removal are frequently encountered tasks. Regarding robotic harvesting, apples, strawberries, tomatoes and sweet peppers are mainly the crops considered in publications, research projects and commercial products. The reported harvesting agricultural robotic solutions, typically consist of a mobile platform, a single robotic arm/manipulator and various navigation/vision systems. This paper reviews reported development of specific functionalities and hardware, typically required by an operating agricultural robot harvester; they include (a) vision systems, (b) motion planning/navigation methodologies (for the robotic platform and/or arm), (c) Human-Robot-Interaction (HRI) strategies with 3D visualization, (d) system operation planning & grasping strategies and (e) robotic end-effector/gripper design. Clearly, automated agriculture and specifically autonomous harvesting via robotic systems is a research area that remains wide open, offering several challenges where new contributions can be made.

Keywords: Agricultural functionalities; Automated agriculture; Robotic harvesting; State-of-art review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of InterestsThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Eberhardt M, Vollrath D. The effect of agricultural technology on the speed of development. World Dev. 2018;109:483–496. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.03.017. - DOI
    1. Fathallah FA. Musculoskeletal disorders in labor-intensive agriculture. Appl. Ergon. 2010;41(6):738–743. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2010.03.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Proto AR, Zimbalatti G. Risk assessment of repetitive movements in the citrus fruit industry. J. Agric. Saf. Health. 2010;16(4):219–228. doi: 10.13031/2013.34834. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhang Z, Wang Y, Zhang Z, Li D, Wu Z, Bai R, Meng G. Ergonomic and efficiency analysis of conventional apple harvest process. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2019;12(2):210–217.
    1. Zhang Z, Zhang Z, Wang X, Liu H, Wang Y, Wang W. Models for economic evaluation of multi-purpose apple harvest platform and software development. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2019;12(1):74–83.

LinkOut - more resources