Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Assessment of genetically modified maize GA21 × T25 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-DE-2016-137)

EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) et al. EFSA J. .

Abstract

Genetically modified maize GA21 × T25 was developed by crossing to combine two single events: GA21 and T25. The GMO Panel previously assessed the two single maize events and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single maize events were identified that could lead to modification of the original conclusions on their safety. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment indicate that the combination of the single maize events and of the newly expressed proteins in maize GA21 × T25 does not give rise to food and feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that maize GA21 × T25, as described in this application, is as safe as its conventional counterpart and the non-GM reference varieties tested, and no post-market monitoring of food and feed is considered necessary. In the case of accidental release of viable maize GA21 × T25 grains into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The post-market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of maize GA21 × T25. Post-market monitoring of food and feed is not considered necessary. The GMO Panel concludes that maize GA21 × T25 is as safe as its conventional counterpart and the non-GM reference varieties tested, with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.

Keywords: GA21; GM; PAT; T25; genetic engineering; mEPSPS; maize (Zea mays).

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Breiteneder H and Mills EN, 2005. Molecular properties of food allergens. Journal of Allergy and ClinicalImmunology, 115, 14–23. - PubMed
    1. Codex Alimentarius , 2009. Foods derived from modern biotechnology. Codex Alimentarius Commission, Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme, Rome, Italy. 85 pp. Available online: http://www.fao.org/docrep/011/a1554e/a1554e00.htm
    1. Costa J, Bavaro SL, Benede S, Diaz‐Perales A, Bueno‐Diaz C, Gelencser E, Klueber J, Larre C, Lozano‐Ojalvo D, Lupi R, Mafra I, Mazzucchelli G, Molina E, Monaci L, Martın‐Pedraza L, Piras C, Rodrigues PM, Roncada P, Schrama D, Cirkovic‐Velickovic T, Verhoeckx K, Villa C, Kuehn A, Hoffmann‐Sommergruber K and Holzhauser T, 2022. Are physicochemical properties shaping the allergenic potency of plant allergens? Clinical Reviews in Allergy and Immunology, 62, 37–63. - PubMed
    1. Droge‐Laser W, Siemeling U, Puhler A and Broer I, 1994. The metabolites of the herbicide L‐phosphinothricin (glufosinate) (identification, stability, and mobility in transgenic, herbicide‐resistant, and untransformed plants). Plant Physiology, 105, 159–166. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eastham K and Sweet J, 2002. Genetically modified organisms (GMOs): The significance of gene flow through pollen transfer. European Environment Agency, Environmental issue report, 28, 1–75

LinkOut - more resources