Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jun;53(6):e13962.
doi: 10.1111/eci.13962. Epub 2023 Feb 8.

Secondary prevention after intracerebral haemorrhage

Affiliations
Review

Secondary prevention after intracerebral haemorrhage

Maddalena Toffali et al. Eur J Clin Invest. 2023 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) has high mortality in the acute phase and poor functional outcome in the majority of survivors. ICH recurrence is a major determinant of long-term prognosis and is the most feared complication of antithrombotic treatment. On the other hand, ICH patients are at high risk of future ischaemic vascular events.

Methods: This narrative review provides a critical analysis of the current knowledge on the topic. We performed a Pubmed search with the following terms 'intracerebral haemorrhage', 'stroke', 'outcome', 'secondary prevention', 'anticoagulation' and 'atrial fibrillation', including only English written studies with no time restrictions.

Results: Blood pressure management is the cornerstone of secondary ICH prevention, regardless of ICH location or underlying cerebral small vessel disease. Resumption of antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy is often challenging, with limited evidence from randomized trials. Clinical and imaging predictors can inform the stratification of ICH recurrence risk and might identify patients at very high probability of future haemorrhagic events. This narrative review provides a summary of the main diagnostic tools and therapeutic strategies available for secondary prevention in ICH survivors.

Conclusion: Appropriate recognition and treatment of modifiable risk factors for ICH recurrence might improve outcomes in ICH survivors. Ongoing randomized trials might provide novel insights and improve long-term management.

Keywords: anticoagulation; atrial fibrillation; intracerebral haemorrhage; outcome; secondary prevention; stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Krishnamurthi RV, Feigin VL, Forouzanfar MH, et al. Global and regional burden of first-ever ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke during 1990-2010: findings from the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet Glob Health. 2013;1(5):e259-e281. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70089-5
    1. van Asch CJ, Luitse MJ, Rinkel GJ, van der Tweel I, Algra A, Klijn CJ. Incidence, case fatality, and functional outcome of intracerebral haemorrhage over time, according to age, sex, and ethnic origin: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9(2):167-176. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70340-0
    1. Poon MTC, Fonville AF, Salman RAS. Long-term prognosis after intracerebral haemorrhage: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014;85(6):660-667. doi:10.1136/jnnp-2013-306476
    1. Casolla B, Moulin S, Kyheng M, et al. Five-year risk of major ischemic and hemorrhagic events after intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2019;50(5):1100-1107. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024449
    1. Kuohn LR, Leasure AC, Acosta JN, et al. Cause of death in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage survivors: multistate longitudinal study. Neurology. 2020;95(20):E2736-E2745. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000010736

LinkOut - more resources